Jeff Weaver- 6th team

timmgirvan · #1 01-31-2007, 11:50 AM

I hope they have a good pitching coach and sports psych up there in Seattle cuz Weavers' been shaky most of his carreer. For the same money he should have stayed loyal with the Cards, who rescued his carreer.

Gander · #2 01-31-2007, 01:01 PM

Weaver pitched good when it counted last year. You can never take that away from him. I dont think the Cards would have won if he wasnt in that rotation.

CapperZeke · #3 01-31-2007, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

I hope they have a good pitching coach and sports psych up there in Seattle cuz Weavers' been shaky most of his carreer. For the same money he should have stayed loyal with the Cards, who rescued his carreer.

He's going right back to the AL west where he sucked for the Angels. He should have stayed in the NL.

Cannon Shell · #4 01-31-2007, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

I hope they have a good pitching coach and sports psych up there in Seattle cuz Weavers' been shaky most of his carreer. For the same money he should have stayed loyal with the Cards, who rescued his carreer.

I dont think the Cards were offering the same money.

timmgirvan · #5 01-31-2007, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I dont think the Cards were offering the same money.

I'm not positive but I heard the Cards offered 8mil for one year! I don't know if Seattle has a team option for 2008

timmgirvan · #6 02-01-2007, 06:05 PM

Just read that the Cards offered Weaver 6mil plus incentives,which probably would have been close to Seattles' offer. Money's money...but I still think he should have stayed with Cards!

Cannon Shell · #7 02-01-2007, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Just read that the Cards offered Weaver 6mil plus incentives,which probably would have been close to Seattles' offer. Money's money...but I still think he should have stayed with Cards!

What makes you think he could reach any incentives? He knows he sucks and took 2 million more.

Zaf · #8 02-01-2007, 10:24 PM

This guy is an UNDERLAY , and sure to disapoint in 2007.

Cannon Shell · #9 02-01-2007, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zaf

This guy is an UNDERLAY , and sure to disapoint in 2007.

He will only disappoint if you think he wont be like 4-13 with 5.63 Era.

timmgirvan · #10 02-02-2007, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

What makes you think he could reach any incentives? He knows he sucks and took 2 million more.

Point taken...starts to believe the press clippings!