Top 10 BC perfomances (last 10 years)

#1 06-20-2006, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zippyneedsawin

1:59 flat is not stellar?

NOW what are you talking about?

again you pick out a portion out of context in an attempt to attack my credibility.

it was not stellar compared to PP's time.

you need to focus on reasons to listen not focus on ways to destroy because you feel like the poster is lacking, due to a credibility issue perpetrated by someone who can skip the defamation process server by posting onilne.

ateamstupid · #2 06-20-2006, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secretariat

again you pick out a portion out of context in an attempt to attack my credibility.

it was not stellar compared to PP's time.

you need to focus on reasons to listen not focus on ways to destroy because you feel like the poster is lacking, due to a credibility issue perpetrated by someone who can skip the defamation process server by posting onilne.

LOL!! IT WAS FASTER THAN PP'S TIME!

And on a slower track, I might add!

See, I'm disobeying my own advice to ignore this dude.

zippyneedsawin · #3 06-20-2006, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

LOL!! IT WAS FASTER THAN PP'S TIME!

And on a slower track, I might add!

See, I'm disobeying my own advice to ignore this dude.

LOL.. that's right..

Pleasantly Perfect (2003, BCC) = 1:59:88

Ghostzapper (2004, BCC) = 1:59:02

Now, these times are not compareable to me... but based on your "logic," who ran the better BCC race, Mayor?

blackthroatedwind · #4 06-20-2006, 03:56 PM

I'm confused. No knock on Pleasantly Perfect, as he was a fine racehorse, but he and Ghostzapper met once on the racetrack and Ghostzapper drowned him. And, if you're arguing about extensive careers, Pleasantly Perfect, if memory serves me correctly, raced under 20 times.

Both were very good horses....but Ghostzapper was better and proved it time and again.

#5 06-20-2006, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I'm confused. No knock on Pleasantly Perfect, as he was a fine racehorse, but he and Ghostzapper met once on the racetrack and Ghostzapper drowned him. And, if you're arguing about extensive careers, Pleasantly Perfect, if memory serves me correctly, raced under 20 times.

Both were very good horses....but Ghostzapper was better and proved it time and again.

again someone who refuses to hear the part about PP having a career ending injury hitting the gate.
he was to go on to the japan cup, but it ended his career.

maybe i should forget the injury part too, and pretend that Gz is the better of the two.

aftyer all isn't that what most modern americans do , go along instead of dealing reason.

blackthroatedwind · #6 06-20-2006, 04:03 PM

Then you must be an even bigger fan of Dynever than I am...as he got a very similar trip to Pleasantly Perfect in the BC Classic ( 2003 ) and lost by about a length and a half.

So, Pleasantly Perfect got injured hitting the gate in the BC Classic? Funny, it didn't affect him enough to prevent him from running a decent third and honestly running no worse than he did in winning the race a year earlier.

zippyneedsawin · #7 06-20-2006, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secretariat

again you pick out a portion out of context in an attempt to attack my credibility.

it was not stellar compared to PP's time.

you need to focus on reasons to listen not focus on ways to destroy because you feel like the poster is lacking, due to a credibility issue perpetrated by someone who can skip the defamation process server by posting onilne.

Compared to Pleasantly Perfect's time?? From the year before? OK, I'm not going down this road with you. I know you live in a dream world where you can compare times from different tracks on different days from different years in different dimensions. I don't remember reading anyone dissing PP.. he was a nice horse too. And his BCC was very good. But when you write things like GZ's "time was not stellar," and Perfect Drift has been a "dominant" force in racing, it's just laughable.

#8 06-20-2006, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zippyneedsawin

Compared to Pleasantly Perfect's time?? From the year before? OK, I'm not going down this road with you. I know you live in a dream world where you can compare times from different tracks on different days from different years in different dimensions. I don't remember reading anyone dissing PP.. he was a nice horse too. And his BCC was very good. But when you write things like GZ's "time was not stellar," and Perfect Drift has been a "dominant" force in racing, it's just laughable.

i grow weary of you talikng down to me.

not many people ever do, and certainly not face to face with me. so in order to avoid this unpleasantry of you using the format to do just that, i will have to move on.

zippyneedsawin · #9 06-20-2006, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secretariat

i grow weary of you talikng down to me.

not many people ever do, and certainly not face to face with me. so in order to avoid this unpleasantry of you using the format to do just that, i will have to move on.

I'm not talking down to you.. If no one disagrees with you in "real life" that's not my problem.
But you're going to hear it on here when you post you nonsense. If you consider that "talking down" to you, that's too bad.

#10 06-20-2006, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zippyneedsawin

I'm not talking down to you.. If no one disagrees with you in "real life" that's not my problem.
But you're going to hear it on here when you post you nonsense. If you consider that "talking down" to you, that's too bad.

What is the point of debating these two horses. Both are great horses and both won the Classic. I would prob put a little more emphasis on PP since he did go over to Dubai. That is something that Zapper never did. But come on you two, just sit back and be thankful that you go to see two great horses race.

Cajungator26 · #11 06-20-2006, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eurobounce

What is the point of debating these two horses. Both are great horses and both won the Classic. I would prob put a little more emphasis on PP since he did go over to Dubai. That is something that Zapper never did. But come on you two, just sit back and be thankful that you go to see two great horses race.

Amen to that!

tap · #12 06-20-2006, 04:18 PM

Just to get things back on track, one that would be up there for me would be Lit de Justice in the 96 sprint. Durkin screaming "he's moving through the field like a gray blur!" Great race, great race call.

zippyneedsawin · #13 06-20-2006, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eurobounce

What is the point of debating these two horses. Both are great horses and both won the Classic. I would prob put a little more emphasis on PP since he did go over to Dubai. That is something that Zapper never did. But come on you two, just sit back and be thankful that you go to see two great horses race.

I think PP and GZ were both very good. I'm just countering what the Mayor is using as his "arguments" for putting down GZ. I certainly never said PP wasn't good.