![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Hmm. Drastically reduces the odds of a rematch, which is a shame because I think that could be good for racing.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Honestly why can’t Maximum Security run in the Belmont? I mean I’m pretty sure I know why but he’s healthy right? It’s not like he’s had a hard campaign.
Is Scuds the racing manager for the West’s? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Maybe West doesn't really want a rematch, just wants to whine about not getting one.
If this horse so great, when does he race again? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Not a fan of West at all however in this case he originally said right after derby Maximum Securities next start is in Haskell. He then made the $5 million dollar challenge. I can't come down on him too hard for not now going to Belmont or being on the fence with Travers...
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
The virtue of a man ought to be measured, not by his extraordinary exertions, but by his everyday conduct. Blaise Pascal |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
BINGO!!!! The whole idea is ludicrous. Those horses He challenged don't need Maximum Security. In fact it is MS who needs them. They will run, earn money and get better while the master bates himself. Run your damn horse or go away!
__________________
Support your local Re-run or horse rescue organization. https://www.rerunottb.com/:) Last edited by richard burch : 05-22-2019 at 08:21 PM. |