![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() How is this related to arbitrage?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() There are multiple ways to bet a horse to win in the paramutuals, and they do not yield equivalent win odds. If you have access to last second odds with a computer ready to instantly analyze the data and make bets, you can take advantage of those differences.
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yeah, I used to do this for baseball, but I'd have to watch lines at multiple books religiously.
I did figure out a way to bet both sides in baseball games where the gain was much much higher, but there was alot of risk involved. It really wasn't arbitrage. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The only ways to negate this--short of banning CRW outfits, which just isn't going to happen with how much handle they produce--are 1.) For exchange wagering to become the national standard or 2.) For every track and ADW to have conditional wagering options. The first remedy would likely take over a decade to implement, but the second one would be relatively easy and could be accomplished within a year. But enough people have to make a stink about this for anything to change. So far, it has mostly gone under-reported.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Conditional wagering means your bet isn't placed unless your desired odds are met at the off. CRW's will still be able to drop the odds at the last second, but regular players would no longer be victimized by it.
|