![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Again, I realize numbers are impossible to be accurate for every circumstance, and this was a 5f race on synthetic, but her performance was better than a 57 indicates.
Not that I'm calling the figure maker stupid, but to me, that was unrealistic, even knowing that figures dont account for things like how easily a horse wins. If the par for that type of race is really two points higher than what the winner scored, well, I have trouble accepting that performance was below average. That is absurd. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
There is no visual element to a final time speed figure. Not one iota. IN fact, in situations where horses are "geared down" late the figures often suffer. That created a big problem in a race like last year's Awesome Again, where California Chrome was clearly slowed to a point where the final time was affected. Synthetics are very tricky for figure making. While the speed of the surface is very consistent, they are highly dependent on pace. Could I have treated Kimberlea K's race different because it had a fast pace for the level? Sure, there's an argument to be made, but at 5fs, you are sure to get into trouble projecting speed figures based on 1/4 mile times. The good thing about it is that she is a 2YO filly who was debuting, so there are ample opportunities for her to run and prove me wrong. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I wasnt trying to insult you or anything like that but I really did expect a significantly higher number and was surprised by the number you came up with. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Your attempt at sarcasm is lame, sorry.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In all candor wouldnt she have been beaten a poll by the good 2 yr olds that have started too date?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I could tell very little by watching that race, actually. I couldn't form an opinion one way or the other, but I did expect a better rating.
|