![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I tend to think its rosario who is to blame for not making a winning move before that all happend.
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It's like he know's when I need him to win.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yep. Whether it should've been a DQ or not, that was indeed a masterclass in race riding by Lezcano, not just for the stretch maneuvers, but also for making sure he beat Rosario to the two-path when going to reel in Catapult near the turn for home.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dream ride from Lezcano IMO. Nothing wrong.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Poker discussion was the second controversy during the day. The real action started in Race #6 as Johnny Velazquez on Kirby's Penny under a left handed whip came out some five or six paths to meet the challenge of You Love. However in the process, Kirby's Penny completely shut-off Dawn the Destroyer under Joel Rosario.
In the head-on, Rosario pulled out of the tight spot, cost his mount forward momentum, and likely avoided clipping heels as a result. I am tired of reading about jockeys who come to the edge without crossing it. That line is now so blurred, there is only the memory of a line that shouldn't be crossed. Hong Kong makes it very clear - ride a straight line in the stretch. Not only does this take the "race riding" controversy off the table, but I am telling you for sure, it is going to save the life of one of the jockeys on the NYRA circuit. It is absolutely beyond me that NYRA has not stepped-in with the steward's decision making. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Since this does seem to be continuously ignored, despite it having been said over and over and over and over and over and over, ad finitum, again...there are three Stewards, one of whom works for NYRA.
If only life were so easy as to blame NYRA for everything, whatever the nebulous NYRA even encompasses.....and before anyone gripes, I said all this LONG before going to work there. I think this discussion is great, but blaming NYRA just detracts from the conversation.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Yes, there is one and only one steward appointed through the auspices of NYRA. Agreed. You have been verbal for players' rights in this herding environment. From that perspective, you are the only one listening. If someone dies on the track (which is how this debate is going to end unless someone steps in), you can be sure that NYRA will be named as defendant and the whatever-defines-NYRA will be pretty well sorted. Unless NYRA can demonstrate that they specifically intervened with the entire set of stewards, it will be a very difficult position to defend as the racetrack operator. There has just been too much press on the issue to ignore the inherent rough riding risks which, to me, have gone beyond the risks inherent in the game. Andy, we have written on Twitter many times before and I know you are not supporting the level of rough riding that we now see. You shoulder way too much "flack" for NYRA based on your very visible persona both on TV, the NYRA Network, and on your own time on boards like these. You seem to be the only one listening - or even commenting - on what is happening between the rails. I am just happy that you are listening even if you are the only one left at NYRA who cares. |