Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:25 AM
MaTH716's Avatar
MaTH716 MaTH716 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
I think you are misconstruing Mig's comments. What he said, essentially, was that he believed that the Stewards would not take the horse down, and explained why he felt that way. I basically agreed with him.

I believe a horse should be taken down for that, but the Stewards have allowed that kind of behavior, and a jockey's responsibility is to do what he or she is legally allowed to do in order to win a race. I am not at all surprised the result stood, and actually think it is consistent with the decisions our Stewards make. Whether you or I agree with them is a completely different conversation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by knickslions2 View Post
I agree that consistent rulings are really all we can ask for and New York tracks seem to be best at that.
At the end of the day, as bettors this is all we can ask and hope for. Going forward, I have a feeling that this race will be the measuring stick for any type of herding infraction/DQ because this one really had to toe the line.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:48 AM
hoovesupsideyourhead's Avatar
hoovesupsideyourhead hoovesupsideyourhead is offline
"The Kentucky Killing Machine"
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 16,278
Default

I tend to think its rosario who is to blame for not making a winning move before that all happend.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-19-2017, 11:51 AM
MaTH716's Avatar
MaTH716 MaTH716 is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead View Post
I tend to think its rosario who is to blame for not making a winning move before that all happend.
It's like he know's when I need him to win.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2017, 12:13 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead View Post
I tend to think its rosario who is to blame for not making a winning move before that all happend.
Yep. Whether it should've been a DQ or not, that was indeed a masterclass in race riding by Lezcano, not just for the stretch maneuvers, but also for making sure he beat Rosario to the two-path when going to reel in Catapult near the turn for home.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2017, 12:15 PM
RHT2004 RHT2004 is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,829
Default

Dream ride from Lezcano IMO. Nothing wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-19-2017, 03:21 PM
ScottJ ScottJ is offline
Narragansett Park
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 585
Default

The Poker discussion was the second controversy during the day. The real action started in Race #6 as Johnny Velazquez on Kirby's Penny under a left handed whip came out some five or six paths to meet the challenge of You Love. However in the process, Kirby's Penny completely shut-off Dawn the Destroyer under Joel Rosario.

In the head-on, Rosario pulled out of the tight spot, cost his mount forward momentum, and likely avoided clipping heels as a result.

I am tired of reading about jockeys who come to the edge without crossing it. That line is now so blurred, there is only the memory of a line that shouldn't be crossed. Hong Kong makes it very clear - ride a straight line in the stretch. Not only does this take the "race riding" controversy off the table, but I am telling you for sure, it is going to save the life of one of the jockeys on the NYRA circuit. It is absolutely beyond me that NYRA has not stepped-in with the steward's decision making.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2017, 03:42 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Since this does seem to be continuously ignored, despite it having been said over and over and over and over and over and over, ad finitum, again...there are three Stewards, one of whom works for NYRA.

If only life were so easy as to blame NYRA for everything, whatever the nebulous NYRA even encompasses.....and before anyone gripes, I said all this LONG before going to work there.

I think this discussion is great, but blaming NYRA just detracts from the conversation.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2017, 03:58 PM
ScottJ ScottJ is offline
Narragansett Park
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
Since this does seem to be continuously ignored, despite it having been said over and over and over and over and over and over, ad finitum, again...there are three Stewards, one of whom works for NYRA.

If only life were so easy as to blame NYRA for everything, whatever the nebulous NYRA even encompasses.....and before anyone gripes, I said all this LONG before going to work there.

I think this discussion is great, but blaming NYRA just detracts from the conversation.
Yes, there are three stewards and they are supposed to have independent oversight on these inquiries without interference. Agreed.

Yes, there is one and only one steward appointed through the auspices of NYRA. Agreed.

You have been verbal for players' rights in this herding environment. From that perspective, you are the only one listening.

If someone dies on the track (which is how this debate is going to end unless someone steps in), you can be sure that NYRA will be named as defendant and the whatever-defines-NYRA will be pretty well sorted. Unless NYRA can demonstrate that they specifically intervened with the entire set of stewards, it will be a very difficult position to defend as the racetrack operator. There has just been too much press on the issue to ignore the inherent rough riding risks which, to me, have gone beyond the risks inherent in the game.

Andy, we have written on Twitter many times before and I know you are not supporting the level of rough riding that we now see. You shoulder way too much "flack" for NYRA based on your very visible persona both on TV, the NYRA Network, and on your own time on boards like these. You seem to be the only one listening - or even commenting - on what is happening between the rails.

I am just happy that you are listening even if you are the only one left at NYRA who cares.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.