Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Stakes Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old 06-11-2017, 01:05 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indian Charlie View Post
Did the Belmont stakes get as high as a 103 because of the results of the Brooklyn?

It seemed like the shorter races were run much much much faster than the Belmont and Brooklyn. I realize figures are not going to cover all circumstances perfectly, because there are always going to be races that don't fit or make sense, but the two mile and a half races seemed to be glacial in comparison to the shorter stakes (Met mile,acorn, phipps, easy goer).
Every other dirt race was one turn. Completely different dynamic than having to go around those giant turns twice. Both the Brooklyn and Belmont figures make total sense in the context of what those horses and the also-rans had been running.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.