facepalm of the day

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

Zig just saying for someone who doesn't like either party your posts are nearly 100% anti Republican. Just own your allegiance to the Dems. I think many on here would respect that more than this charade.

No, i am anti trump, who, by the way, is not even a republican.
I am not registered with either party, nor will i ever be.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

No, i am anti trump.
I am not registered with either party, nor will i ever be.

[geeker2]

hater.jpg

[Danzig]

"While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things."

He obviously has not read it, else he would know the man has exactly that right!

[jms62]

I am having trouble reconciling something here. The democrats the champions of equal rights for gays, equal pay and treatment for women march out this guy
and exploit a tragedy that happened to him and his family. Where do you think he falls in on those topics. Both parties make me feel as if I need to take a daily bath in Clorox.


http://www.tmn.today/2016/08/khizr-k...-past-exposed/

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by jms62

I am having trouble reconciling something here. The democrats the champions of equal rights for gays, equal pay and treatment for women march out this guy
and exploit a tragedy that happened to him and his family. Where do you think he falls in on those topics. Both parties make me feel as if I need to take a daily bath in Clorox.


http://www.tmn.today/2016/08/khizr-k...-past-exposed/

It is a distraction tactic - that is all the Left has. There is literally no possible way Clinton can run on the "Obama Legacy" and survive a minute.

It is difficult to understand precisely what Trump is doing here, but from my perspective he's guilty only of speaking a bit too loosely - not something you need to be doing when every single globalist media outlet is looking for nothing except "slip-ups" to beat you with.

I'm hoping that he is being coached to stop doing these unscripted, massive rallies. They only serve gin up his already established base, and open him up to incessant, never-ending, ridicule from these children masquerading as *journalists* that do nothing at all except find ways to pick every single inflection apart as negative, while the left enjoys free range.
For fuc1<'s sake, she misspoke, Proclaiming as loudly as she could cackle, that she was "going to raise taxes on the middle class" which was met with thunderous cheer from the zombies in the audience. Not a peep. Imagine for a second were the shoe on the other foot.

The point is, if she runs on the Obama legacy she gets to flaunt this:



She just need to pray he keeps shooting himself in the foot for the press to lap up.

[OldDog]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

It is a distraction tactic - that is all the Left has. There is literally no possible way Clinton can run on the "Obama Legacy" and survive a minute.



She just need to pray he keeps shooting himself in the foot for the press to lap up.

And this is what Trump ought to be talking about.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

I am having trouble reconciling something here. The democrats the champions of equal rights for gays, equal pay and treatment for women march out this guy
and exploit a tragedy that happened to him and his family. Where do you think he falls in on those topics. Both parties make me feel as if I need to take a daily bath in Clorox.


http://www.tmn.today/2016/08/khizr-k...-past-exposed/

he was asked to speak, as one of the 'everyday Americans' they would invite to the convention his wife encouraged him to do so. what does his speaking at the convention have to do with equal rights, pay, etc? I expected an article related to something regarding that.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/04/politi...mp-muslim-ban/

[OldDog]

Originally Posted by Danzig

he was asked to speak, as one of the 'everyday Americans' they would invite to the convention his wife encouraged him to do so. what does his speaking at the convention have to do with equal rights, pay, etc? I expected an article related to something regarding that.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/04/politi...mp-muslim-ban/

Yep, just an "everyday American" lawyer who specializes in the procurement of EB5 immigration visas and other “Related Immigration Services," according to his now deleted website, and who worked for a D.C. law firm which was retained by the government of Saudi Arabia, did Clinton's tax returns and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her home-brew email server.

[OldDog]

Originally Posted by Danzig

"While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things."

He obviously has not read it, else he would know the man has exactly that right!

What has Trump proposed that is unconstitutional? Was it building a wall, deporting illegal immigrants, or temporarily banning the entry of foreign Muslims? Because non of those are unconstitutional. And I doubt that Khan was referring to eminent domain.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by OldDog

What has Trump proposed that is unconstitutional? Was it building a wall, deporting illegal immigrants, or temporarily banning the entry of foreign Muslims? Because non of those are unconstitutional. And I doubt that Khan was referring to eminent domain.

the bolded part. trump said the guy didn't have a right to say what he said. he has that right under the first amendment.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

the bolded part. trump said the guy didn't have a right to say what he said. he has that right under the first amendment.

You cannot possibly be as stupid as you constantly try to convince us you are.

[OldDog]

Originally Posted by Danzig

the bolded part. trump said the guy didn't have a right to say what he said. he has that right under the first amendment.

ROR!

I see what you did there.