![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Neither for the most part.
I did box the Miss Star Maker race. I keyed Takeover Target on top with a few in second at various amounts. Would have been better for me had Grand Arch gotten second. I keyed Cherry Wine in second under Nyquist and Exaggerator - I didn't play Cherry Wine on top because I had him "protected" in doubles if he were to win. I used 4 horses in the Sweet race but only 3 in the win slot and the best combination came through for me based on how I bet the race. I played to specific payouts if that makes sense...So altered the amount bet so it was roughly the same payout regardless of which one of my opinions within the race hit. I did go heaviest on Takeover Target - Grand Arch and Nyquist - Cherry Wine. I originally thought I had Takeover Target - Ring Weekend for $120 but at the window I halved that amount at the last second in favor of going heavier on Grand Arch. ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ty,
I think your approach was very sound. My strategy in live money events is to pass through as many races as I need to allow me to bet heavily on my few strong opinions. To have success, you need at least one good opinion and you have to have the stomach to make big bets. You had several good opinions and made them count. Congratulations. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It also seemed like the no trifecta but doubles rule worked out well. Will be interesting to see if that is used at future tournaments. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Great Job Guys!
![]()
__________________
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() interesting thread here. Some congrats, some no. Lotta love for Vic
|