GOP debate

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

So I guess the best gaffe happened at the GOP Jr debate already.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a..._give_you.html

And:

Oops

[jms62]

Think it is sad that we are clamoring so much for a woman to lead that the best we can put up is a failed CEO Carly Fiorina and someone who has used their political office to generate hundreds of millions in profits. Meanwhile Condoleezza Rice and Elizabeth Warren remain on the sidelines. These two alone are smarter than the sum of what we saw yesterday.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by jms62

Think it is sad that we are clamoring so much for a woman to lead that the best we can put up is a failed CEO Carly Fiorina and someone who has used their political office to generate hundreds of millions in profits. Meanwhile Condoleezza Rice and Elizabeth Warren remain on the sidelines. These two alone are smarter than the sum of what we saw yesterday.

Big fan of Ms Rice...said before that she is the only Republican I would vote for, wish she would consider running. Trump did ok last night, held his own against nine clowns. Only thing noteworthy about last night is that Christie came across as willing to cut social security for the uber-rich. News flash...all want to destroy ACA and gays right to marry, what a surprise!

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Big fan of Ms Rice...said before that she is the only Republican I would vote for, wish she would consider running. Trump did ok last night, held his own against nine clowns. Only thing noteworthy about last night is that Christie came across as willing to cut social security for the uber-rich. News flash...all want to destroy ACA and gays right to marry, what a surprise!

trump may have done ok, but he wasn't with nine clowns..he was one of ten clowns.

[bigrun]

psychologists-urge-people-with-low-self-esteem-to-watch-g-o-p-debate


http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borow...intcid=mod-yml

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

Think it is sad that we are clamoring so much for a woman to lead that the best we can put up is a failed CEO Carly Fiorina and someone who has used their political office to generate hundreds of millions in profits. Meanwhile Condoleezza Rice and Elizabeth Warren remain on the sidelines. These two alone are smarter than the sum of what we saw yesterday.

i don't want 'a woman' for president. just like i don't want a man, or a black guy, or a white guy, or whatever...
i want a good leader.
if it's a white guy/girl, black, red, purple..i don't care.
completely agree that fiorina and hilary are awful. warren is intriguing...rice on the other hand..wasn't she involved in the 'let's make a case to invade iraq' cabal?

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i don't want 'a woman' for president. just like i don't want a man, or a black guy, or a white guy, or whatever...
i want a good leader.
if it's a white guy/girl, black, red, purple..i don't care.
completely agree that fiorina and hilary are awful. warren is intriguing...rice on the other hand..wasn't she involved in the 'let's make a case to invade iraq' cabal?

Condy Rice is a rare public figure...highly intelligent, confident but not arrogant, not a politician whose ambition outweighs her abilities. She has shown me the ability to think for herself free from the mindless parroting of partisan talking points. I disagree with many of her positions but the same can be said of Obama, Clinton and the Republican hoard. I consider her a person of integrity gifted with intelligence....find me another like her in today's political mess!

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Condy Rice is a rare public figure...highly intelligent, confident but not arrogant, not a politician whose ambition outweighs her abilities. She has shown me the ability to think for herself free from the mindless parroting of partisan talking points. I disagree with many of her positions but the same can be said of Obama, Clinton and the Republican hoard. I consider her a person of integrity gifted with intelligence....find me another like her in today's political mess!

That may well be so....but
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/20...i-wexler-lies/

If the war was justified, one wouldn't have to lie to get support for it.
and many politicians have the 'integrity' she has.

"An honest politician is one who, when he is bought, will stay bought."simon cameron

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

they all suck..split the vote and give it to the democrats again..

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

they all suck..split the vote and give it to the democrats again..

Why can't we get good people in office? So many just.....suck. I know I was reading about a former pol the other day, that someone had criticized the ex pol for not leaving d.c. rich!

[jms62]

Originally Posted by somerfrost

Condy Rice is a rare public figure...highly intelligent, confident but not arrogant, not a politician whose ambition outweighs her abilities. She has shown me the ability to think for herself free from the mindless parroting of partisan talking points. I disagree with many of her positions but the same can be said of Obama, Clinton and the Republican hoard. I consider her a person of integrity gifted with intelligence....find me another like her in today's political mess!

[GenuineRisk]

I was not a fan of Rice as Secretary of State. She would have been fine if the Soviet Union were still in existence. But it wasn't and I felt she wasn't able to adjust her foreign policy views to a post dual-superpower world.

I think Elizabeth Warren is better in the Senate at this point.

I think Clinton would be fine as President, but she's not a good candidate; she doesn't have her husband's or Obama's charisma. I dunno. Then again, she can probably handle whatever the GOP campaign throws at her; she's had plenty of practice. It still boggles my mind that Kerry didn't come back with both barrels over the Swift Boat crap. Someone else who I think would have been a good President, but was a terrible candidate.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

I was not a fan of Rice as Secretary of State. She would have been fine if the Soviet Union were still in existence. But it wasn't and I felt she wasn't able to adjust her foreign policy views to a post dual-superpower world.

I think Elizabeth Warren is better in the Senate at this point.

I think Clinton would be fine as President, but she's not a good candidate; she doesn't have her husband's or Obama's charisma. I dunno. Then again, she can probably handle whatever the GOP campaign throws at her; she's had plenty of practice. It still boggles my mind that Kerry didn't come back with both barrels over the Swift Boat crap. Someone else who I think would have been a good President, but was a terrible candidate.

LOL talk about delusional....She will likely be on trial or already on her way to prison by election day 2016. And she may prefer that to dealing with this pitbull (who will be on the main stage next time):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyxLGc0RDZc

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

I think Diogenes would keep looking...