Quinella at Belmont?

[JolyB]

I have often followed the quinella will-pays in races 2 and 4 on NYRA races, comparing them to the exacta will-pays on the same combinations.

I've found that the quinella will generally pay more than the same amount invested in an exacta box on the same horses when the shorter priced horse of the two wins, and will pay less than the exacta box when the longer priced horse of the two wins. My decision of whether to use the quinella or exacta box often comes down to which of the two horses I think is the best one to have on top. If the shorter priced one, I go quinella; if the longer priced one, I go exacta box.

I know that this oversimplifies a much more complicated equation. This method has worked for me as a way of sometimes using the quinella to obtain a slightly better payoff on combinations I want to use.

The article you referred to was very helpful. One sentence from that article makes this process very difficult:

" There will always be some uncertainty in the final payoffs due to last minute bets and off-track bets that are added to the pari-mutuel pools after the close of betting."

Unfortunately, this statement is even more true today than when the article was written, and sometimes has the effect of defeating the very search for extra value that this process attempts to accomplish.

[Dunbar]

Originally Posted by JolyB

I have often followed the quinella will-pays in races 2 and 4 on NYRA races, comparing them to the exacta will-pays on the same combinations.

I've found that the quinella will generally pay more than the same amount invested in an exacta box on the same horses when the shorter priced horse of the two wins, and will pay less than the exacta box when the longer priced horse of the two wins. My decision of whether to use the quinella or exacta box often comes down to which of the two horses I think is the best one to have on top. If the shorter priced one, I go quinella; if the longer priced one, I go exacta box.

I know that this oversimplifies a much more complicated equation. This method has worked for me as a way of sometimes using the quinella to obtain a slightly better payoff on combinations I want to use.

The article I linked to assumes you have no reason to think that the exacta has more overlay value than the exacta reverse. We are merely considering using them in place of a quinella. When you bet a quinella, you don't care which of the 2 horses comes in first because you get paid the same either way. If you're going to bet exactas instead, you bet them in amounts that will give you the same net win, regardless of order. (there are examples in the article.)

If, on the other hand, you have an opinion that one of the exacta orders has a bigger edge, then my article doesn't apply.

Originally Posted by JolyB

The article you referred to was very helpful. One sentence from that article makes this process very difficult:

" There will always be some uncertainty in the final payoffs due to last minute bets and off-track bets that are added to the pari-mutuel pools after the close of betting."

Unfortunately, this statement is even more true today than when the article was written, and sometimes has the effect of defeating the very search for extra value that this process attempts to accomplish.

I'm glad you found it helpful.

Yes, I agree that there's even more late betting today, and the quinella pools are generally pretty small and not that common. (at the time of the article, Santa Anita was offering quinellas on every race.)

Still, if I liked two horses approximately equally in a race where quinellas were offered, I'd do the "Q-test" check to see if the exactas offered a better payout. The additional edge may or may not be there after the final betting, but I'd rather be on the +15% side going into the last minute than the -15% side.

[Kitan]

Originally Posted by JolyB

I have often followed the quinella will-pays in races 2 and 4 on NYRA races, comparing them to the exacta will-pays on the same combinations.

I've found that the quinella will generally pay more than the same amount invested in an exacta box on the same horses when the shorter priced horse of the two wins, and will pay less than the exacta box when the longer priced horse of the two wins. My decision of whether to use the quinella or exacta box often comes down to which of the two horses I think is the best one to have on top. If the shorter priced one, I go quinella; if the longer priced one, I go exacta box.

I know that this oversimplifies a much more complicated equation. This method has worked for me as a way of sometimes using the quinella to obtain a slightly better payoff on combinations I want to use.

The article you referred to was very helpful. One sentence from that article makes this process very difficult:

" There will always be some uncertainty in the final payoffs due to last minute bets and off-track bets that are added to the pari-mutuel pools after the close of betting."

Unfortunately, this statement is even more true today than when the article was written, and sometimes has the effect of defeating the very search for extra value that this process attempts to accomplish.

I think, from what I've seen, that generally the $2 Q will pay better than a $1 Ex. The cases I've seen where it hasn't is where there's been a double digit winner with the 1st or 2nd fav second, which makes sense. If you think the two faves will run 1-2 then it seems the Q is the way to go.

[jnunan4759]

I think most of the people at my OTB don't even know the Quinella exists in NY. I will play it but only when I'm looking at an exacta-type bet and I like to look at the combos and "shop" for a better price. It's usually not a great deal of difference, but it all helps. I also find that the Quinella payouts fluctuate less. Probably because it's a smaller pool and bigger money can alter the EX payouts late.

It's probably more popular at Saratoga than anywhere else. I know a bunch of $2 people who play it.

I'm kind of surprised they've kept it this long, it's an old bet. I would think it's one of, if not the single, smallest pools.

[Kitan]

Pulled up the charts from Saturday because I wanted to see what the pool would be like on a big day.

R2 Ex pool $222k
R2 Q pool $11.5k

R4 Ex pool $276k
R4 Q pool $13k

Definitely not as popular here as it is overseas.

[jnunan4759]

Wow, that's only 5%. I was thinking maybe 10% or 12%.