![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
"Clearly better" usually means more than one out of ten people that know anything about watching races would agree with you. I would have trouble finding one out of 100 that actually think Frosted's Derby effort was "clearly better" than the effort of Materiality.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() I would have hoped that Materiality would have run a decent last quarter, as the horse was lost for the better part of the race. Keen Ice must be considered a real threat too, following this line of reasoning. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Couldn't have possibly have been watching the race. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
He wasn't watching the start either.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks, I completely took that for granted. In my defense, here California, we've been taught by the stewards that problems at the start couldn't possibly effect the outcome of a race.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here too....despite it being the most important part of the race....where the most stuff happens that can dramatically affect the running of the race. It's fascinating actually.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Oh, perhaps they should have declared the the entire race a non-wagering even and returned all of the pools because there's no way to prove the starter didn't possibly compromised his start Whatever. I think the horse is dressed up, based on what he has proven on the track, you think he has talent. So be it - we'll find out soon enough |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |