![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Careful now. The old "stats have fallen off" argument actually IS precious. Now, I will admit, 106 starters in a year is not a good enough sample to prove against a five year record, and perhaps one could find a 12 month period during that five year run that was comparable, but those numbers are surely not meaningless.
It would be interesting to compare the speed figures of the runners in that 106 start sample to their numbers from the prior year. I understand the side you're taking, and there is much to be said for it, but being dismissive of stats, especially when they come from someone like Doug, is at best defensive on your part. Stats are actually a very strong argument for the other side of your arguement.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |