NFL Betting Log

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

3-3 on year.

3-3 going into this game.
Packers minus 8 is the play tonight. Under what scenario is Minnesota even competitive?

[jms62]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

3-3 going into this game.
Packers minus 8 is the play tonight. Under what scenario is Minnesota even competitive?

Certainly no scenario involving Christan Ponder

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by jms62

Certainly no scenario involving Christan Ponder

Joe Montana, in his prime, wouldn't have helped last night.

And I thought the Buccaneers were a mess. Wow.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Joe Montana, in his prime, wouldn't have helped last night.

And I thought the Buccaneers were a mess. Wow.

well, they are.
the 'skins might win this next game.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

well, they are.
the 'skins might win this next game.

I had two friends come up to me after we almost beat the Eagles and say, "Well, looks like you found your starting QB"..

I responded "not so fast, Kirk has shown up yet". Of course he did show up for all the world to see the following week against the Giants.

It is with good reason he's the backup and has been the backup. Unfortunately, this redesigned offense does nothing but exploit RG III's weaknesses. He'll never be a pocket passer.

Big troubles in 'Ole DC. But we are used to it by now.


The Bucs on the other hand are in a horrible division, are getting 2 starting linemen and 1 starting DB back this week, and are playing against a horrid N.O. secondary. If they can get pressure on Brees like they did Rothlesberger last week, the outcome of that game is going shock many.

The line opened at 11 and is down to 10, I'd prefer 10.5 but it still is a good value at 10 IMO.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

I had two friends come up to me after we almost beat the Eagles and say, "Well, looks like you found your starting QB"..

I responded "not so fast, Kirk has shown up yet". Of course he did show up for all the world to see the following week against the Giants.

It is with good reason he's the backup and has been the backup. Unfortunately, this redesigned offense does nothing but exploit RG III's weaknesses. He'll never be a pocket passer.

Big troubles in 'Ole DC. But we are used to it by now.


The Bucs on the other hand are in a horrible division, are getting 2 starting linemen and 1 starting DB back this week, and are playing against a horrid N.O. secondary. If they can get pressure on Brees like they did Rothlesberger last week, the outcome of that game is going shock many.

The line opened at 11 and is down to 10, I'd prefer 10.5 but it still is a good value at 10 IMO.

i turned off the giants game, it was beyond painful.
i don't think it matters whether cousins or rg3, we need a new owner (and a new qb).
but what i really don't get --why the hell did gruden keep haslett as the DC? that team used to at least have a D, doesn't even have that now!

[dellinger63]

Week 5 Continued
Minus $400

$100 Cincinnati -1
$100 Under Cleveland 44
$200 Under Tampa 48
$200 Over Denver 48

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

Certainly no scenario involving Christan Ponder

was an ugly 'game'.
it was so bad i put on preseason hockey....edmonton vs vancouver!

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

3-3 going into this game.
Packers minus 8 is the play tonight. Under what scenario is Minnesota even competitive?

4-3