![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
First off, all three of his turf races were breakout races. His first two dirt races, while considerably unimpressive to you, were very impressive to me for the exact reasons you thought he sucked on dirt. How many times and in how many ways can this be explained to you? As I thought would happen, he finally, for the first time in his entire career, put everything together in the Derby. While I do have a penchant for picking out horses that are destined to have five race or less careers, Barbaro was not the type who fit that mold. He was sound and suffered a freak injury leaving the gate, FFS. What does any of this have to do with Bernardini? Quite a bit, or nothing at all. I suppose it depends on how much you limit your perspective. My thoughts are that had he not broken down, Bernardini would have had to chase Barbaro in the Preakness, thus not getting his usual 100% perfect dream trip. Yeah, I know, he didn't need the lead, but chasing Barbaro would have been a whole different ball game then chasing what turned out to be a brutally bad field. I seriously doubt he'd have won the race and the legend that he was becoming that year would have been derailed right there. He'd have been exposed well before the BCC and apologists like you would have had no excuses to blame his loss on. He wouldn't have been the 3yo champion, and had he faced Barbaro in one of those awful g1s he won that summer, he'd have not gone off to stud with all the fanfare due a superhorse. Hell, I bet he would have raced at four. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|