Speaking of Uncle Joe...

[pointman]

Originally Posted by bigrun

Hey jackoff, speaking of original thought show me where you uttered just one..Even a dolt like you must have ONE..and please, not all that crap you pull down from Fox,Coulter,Rush and other wingnuts..it's not people like me that doomed this country, we built it. You and your ilk are so far right you went over the edge and destroyed it..You want a starting point, how bout the year 2000, i.e. G Dumya Bush..and downhill since..In a word IRAQ!!..I didn't vote for Obama, i voted against repukeism..You don't like my cartoons, good, i'll continue on course..and you should allow your sockpuppet to reply..and get back to chasing riot, i miss my laughs watching you guys get shot down at every turn..

That avatar is an old Navy vet and best friend since Jr high, lost him last year..and he was further right than you bozos..

Nice job making an absolute fool of yourself. You are the only sock puppet here and you consistently need Riot to make a fool of herself in an attempt to save you. Get over it, the many other people who expose your daily fraudulent positions are not sock puppets, they are people who have intellect and common sense.

Now why don't you go and try another dishonest liberal fallback out of the Axelrod playbook and keep calling those who call for stricter immigration enforcement raciest's, jackass. Or better yet, do us all a favor and put your head back in the sand and use your hands to wave your Obama pom poms instead of typing and making a fool of yourself.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by pointman

Nice job making an absolute fool of yourself. You are the only sock puppet here and you consistently need Riot to make a fool of herself in an attempt to save you. Get over it, the many other people who expose your daily fraudulent positions are not sock puppets, they are people who have intellect and common sense.

Now why don't you go and try another dishonest liberal fallback out of the Axelrod playbook and keep calling those who call for stricter immigration enforcement raciest's, jackass. Or better yet, do us all a favor and put your head back in the sand and use your hands to wave your Obama pom poms instead of typing and making a fool of yourself.

Dodging the question again and attack attack, your only out...you and that puppet you dragged out of the closet preaching the same old song...and find the post where i called ANYONE a racist,dipschit..I'm not in to name calling..except in your case....you know, tit for tat...

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by pointman

Nice job making an absolute fool of yourself. You are the only sock puppet here and you consistently need Riot to make a fool of herself in an attempt to save you. Get over it, the many other people who expose your daily fraudulent positions are not sock puppets, they are people who have intellect and common sense.

Now why don't you go and try another dishonest liberal fallback out of the Axelrod playbook and keep calling those who call for stricter immigration enforcement raciest's, jackass. Or better yet, do us all a favor and put your head back in the sand and use your hands to wave your Obama pom poms instead of typing and making a fool of yourself.

I'm curious why someone who is making a statement against something you believe to be to true is a fool? Seriously PM...Aren't you open to any beliefs other than yours? Riot argues as vehemently against your opinons as Mr Dispenser does aganist mine..yet he gets a and she gets an insult? Don't you see my point?

[pointman]

Originally Posted by GBBob

I'm curious why someone who is making a statement against something you believe to be to true is a fool? Seriously PM...Aren't you open to any beliefs other than yours? Riot argues as vehemently against your opinons as Mr Dispenser does aganist mine..yet he gets a and she gets an insult? Don't you see my point?

Take a look back at this thread, where it started, where it led to and who shifted the debate there and then I think you may understand why I responded the way I did.

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by pointman

Take a look back at this thread, where it started, where it led to and who shifted the debate there and then I think you may understand why I responded the way I did.

I did read back....other than BR's use of a term that is understood and not an insult where he lives, what's the big deal? Isn't this just another chance for you guys to just rip on Riot?

I'm not trying to be a troll, but I'll ask you the same thing I've asked Kev, Mr Dispenser and others...Please tell me why Mitt is a great candidate and potential World leader with out bashing Liberals. I know you hate us and Obama, but why can't anyone tell me what Mitt is going to do?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by GBBob

I did read back....other than BR's use of a term that is understood and not an insult where he lives, what's the big deal? Isn't this just another chance for you guys to just rip on Riot?

I'm not trying to be a troll, but I'll ask you the same thing I've asked Kev, Mr Dispenser and others...Please tell me why Mitt is a great candidate and potential World leader with out bashing Liberals. I know you hate us and Obama, but why can't anyone tell me what Mitt is going to do?

you didn't ask me, but my guess is no one bashing obama completely while extolling romney because they think romney will actually do anything of benefit to most of us. but for some on here, the very reason they will vote for romney is that he is not obama. they will vote for him because he is a republican, and the party nominee. just like some on here will vote for obama, because he is a democrat and that party's nominee. some vote a straight party line ticket. i can say i have never done so in my life. i wonder tho, how many can say that is the case?

Today's Republicans are a far cry from Republicans of yesteryear. I voted for Rockefeller (Republican) for Governor of NY in 1966 and 1970, and voted for John Lindsay (Republican-Liberal; how do you figure that?) for NYC Mayor in 1965 and 1969.

I would have voted for John Housman this year had he gotten the nomination.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Ocala Mike

Today's Republicans are a far cry from Republicans of yesteryear. I voted for Rockefeller (Republican) for Governor of NY in 1966 and 1970, and voted for John Lindsay (Republican-Liberal; how do you figure that?) for NYC Mayor in 1965 and 1969.

I would have voted for John Housman this year had he gotten the nomination.

I was born and raised Republican. Colin Powell, William F. Buckley. Yeah, I liked Lindsey and Rockefeller, too. Today's Republicans, however, are what used to be the John Birch Society, and they've taken over.

Obama would have made an outstanding Republican after Nixon, although he'd be more conservative than Nixon!

It's funny, as "conservatives" in England are now to the left of our Democrats nowadays (the Dems who have take a far, far fling to the right, too, as the GOP went off the cliff to the far right and dragged them with them)

[pointman]

Originally Posted by GBBob

I did read back....other than BR's use of a term that is understood and not an insult where he lives, what's the big deal? Isn't this just another chance for you guys to just rip on Riot?

I'm not trying to be a troll, but I'll ask you the same thing I've asked Kev, Mr Dispenser and others...Please tell me why Mitt is a great candidate and potential World leader with out bashing Liberals. I know you hate us and Obama, but why can't anyone tell me what Mitt is going to do?

The problem I had here is that this thread started out as a very valid criticism of Joe Biden for a very distasteful pander in order to get votes for Obama. Riot and Bigrun, as usual, immediately deny the obvious and then deflect the issues over to Paul Ryan.

I am not on here to claim that Romney is the greatest thing in the world. Frankly, I am a big Chris Christie fan and wanted him to be the Repulican nominee. I also do not put thread after thread of nonsense favoring my choice of candidate and complete and utter BS on a daily basis attacking Romney attempting to shove my politics down other people's throats. I am here for one reason. I have grown tired of Riot's constant bashing of everything Republican, cheering of everything liberal and her consistent demeaning of posters which have chased many away. She may bully others, but it doesn't work with me.

I am sorry if you don't agree with what I am doing, but I feel that Riot cannot be allowed to run loose here and just bash anyone who disagrees with her. What I find odd is that you are quick to question my motives as well as an intelligent new poster's, but always ready to give the person whose behavior is clearly worse than any other's around here a free pass because she sides with you on politics.

[my miss storm cat]

Originally Posted by pointman

I also do not put thread after thread of nonsense favoring my choice of candidate and complete and utter BS on a daily basis attacking Romney attempting to shove my politics down other people's throats.

It's amazing to me that you even have to say something so true and so obvious...

[pointman]

Originally Posted by my miss storm cat

It's amazing to me that you even have to say something so true and so obvious...

Incredible, isn't it? There is a double standard around here, one that allows Riot to get away unfettered and one that denounces those who attempt to challenge it.

Originally Posted by GBBob

I'm curious why someone who is making a statement against something you believe to be to true is a fool? Seriously PM...Aren't you open to any beliefs other than yours? Riot argues as vehemently against your opinons as Mr Dispenser does aganist mine..yet he gets a and she gets an insult? Don't you see my point?

So I heard you were accusing me of being the new faux republican f.ucktard...so I had to look at your attempt as trolling to get me back. Well it worked.

Bob, I know a little about you now. I can only assume you're a spy/paid shill for foreigners who want to destroy this country. It's the only viable conclusion I could come up with. Because you're not retarded.

But a paid shill would repeatedly parrot that gay rights and abortion are the big issues they're concerned about for the 2012 election. I'm too lazy to link the two posts but you did say that.

So who is paying you? Is part of the deal in your big business operation that involves selling your soul to China involve being a total f.ucking buffoon on the internet to brainwash people into agreeing with you that gay rights and abortion are what they should base their vote on?

Because that is the pattern I'm seeing from you. It just wreaks of disingenuous slacktivism on your part. Or maybe you're just projecting.

If so, congratulations on your engagement and future wedding, abortion, divorce, and marriage to Teddy.

Ciao, douche.

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

So I heard you were accusing me of being the new faux republican f.ucktard...so I had to look at your attempt as trolling to get me back. Well it worked.

Bob, I know a little about you now. I can only assume you're a spy/paid shill for foreigners who want to destroy this country. It's the only viable conclusion I could come up with. Because you're not retarded.

But a paid shill would repeatedly parrot that gay rights and abortion are the big issues they're concerned about for the 2012 election. I'm too lazy to link the two posts but you did say that.

So who is paying you? Is part of the deal in your big business operation that involves selling your soul to China involve being a total f.ucking buffoon on the internet to brainwash people into agreeing with you that gay rights and abortion are what they should base their vote on?

Because that is the pattern I'm seeing from you. It just wreaks of disingenuous slacktivism on your part. Or maybe you're just projecting.

If so, congratulations on your engagement and future wedding, abortion, divorce, and marriage to Teddy.

Ciao, douche.

Actually Coach, I thought Mr Dispenser was a wildly successful character that only a few brilliant people could create...you and Drugs being the two I thought of first. Not sure why the lashing out because I thought we had a comfortable "agree to not agree" understanding. I enjoy the debate far more than I do the seriousness of the debate. If you truly think they we are on a road to destruction, than so be it..I don't. And enough with the douche stuff..seriously?

Originally Posted by GBBob

Actually Coach, I thought Mr Dispenser was a wildly successful character that only a few brilliant people could create...you and Drugs being the two I thought of first. Not sure why the lashing out because I thought we had a comfortable "agree to not agree" understanding. I enjoy the debate far more than I do the seriousness of the debate. If you truly think they we are on a road to destruction, than so be it..I don't. And enough with the douche stuff..seriously?

Look I'm working on not calling people douches when they clearly are. It's redundant, I know. The whole deal of being phony so the fragile people can feel comfortable to post. I get it.

The problem I have with it is the whole conforming issue. I feel it's the reason why we're in such a global financial mess. We conform. We don't call people douches and we don't call them out for their behavior.

What you said in one of the Paul "controlled opposition/tea party infiltrator/status quo scumbag" Ryan threads is that you're concerned about gay issues and abortion. Not much else.

That's insanity to me. I think you're so asleep and programmed that you don't realize you're a parrot and champion for the destruction of the human species from this planet.

Ok so lets say we make abortion and gay sex legal and allow gays to get married. Then what would the sheep b.itch about next? It obviously won't be important issues like foreign policy and out of control spending by our government.

Will gay rights and abortion lower the rising cost of food? What good is it if you can take it in the ass legally but can't muster the strength to get your dick hard because a loaf of bread costs $20?

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Look I'm working on not calling people douches when they clearly are. It's redundant, I know. The whole deal of being phony so the fragile people can feel comfortable to post. I get it.

The problem I have with it is the whole conforming issue. I feel it's the reason why we're in such a global financial mess. We conform. We don't call people douches and we don't call them out for their behavior.

What you said in one of the Paul "controlled opposition/tea party infiltrator/status quo scumbag" Ryan threads is that you're concerned about gay issues and abortion. Not much else.

That's insanity to me. I think you're so asleep and programmed that you don't realize you're a parrot and champion for the destruction of the human species from this planet.

Ok so lets say we make abortion and gay sex legal and allow gays to get married. Then what would the sheep b.itch about next? It obviously won't be important issues like foreign policy and out of control spending by our government.

Will gay rights and abortion lower the rising cost of food? What good is it if you can take it in the ass legally but can't muster the strength to get your dick hard because a loaf of bread costs $20?

You're right..I probably do focus on the social issues too much. But I think those are issues that are most impacted by who we elect and are most impactful to the individual. To me, the economy is an independant entity that just ebbs and flows regardless of who is in office. That is admittedly a very big generalization, but it seems that The President at the time and the state of the economy don't run parallel so I look elsewhere when deciding who to vote for.

And if bread is $20 a loaf it won't be because of who is President..it will be because of the weather

Look...I'm not trying to blow you here, but you're a smart dude. I don't agree with most of what you post...at least recently and vice-versa I'm sure, but we both have been here a long time and without divurging (sp?) opinions and even radical opinions, this will turn into Pace Adv or the opposite.

Originally Posted by GBBob

You're right..I probably do focus on the social issues too much. But I think those are issues that are most impacted by who we elect and are most impactful to the individual. To me, the economy is an independant entity that just ebbs and flows regardless of who is in office. That is admittedly a very big generalization, but it seems that The President at the time and the state of the economy don't run parallel so I look elsewhere when deciding who to vote for.

And if bread is $20 a loaf it won't be because of who is President..it will be because of the weather

Look...I'm not trying to blow you here, but you're a smart dude. I don't agree with most of what you post...at least recently and vice-versa I'm sure, but we both have been here a long time and without divurging (sp?) opinions and even radical opinions, this will turn into Pace Adv or the opposite.

You are partly right that the economy ebbs and flows independently from government. It is controlled by a separate entity that is accountable to no one.

And when called into question at debates the puppets who are owned by them laugh at the man who has the courage to question the beast that is the Federal Reserve.

And, of course, the man who questions the Fed has a complacent stance on abortion and gay rights.

That's where I say it was planned that way. To believe otherwise is naive and that's where I get abusive towards folks who don't see the problem for what it is.

Bob I know you're a smart guy and have been successful professionally. It's understandable that you're supportive of this country and still believe in the process that made you successful.

I propose that you are successful, in part, due to collectivism and the abandonment of your core beliefs for profit. You made a decision for you and your potential future generations that was the most beneficial. That's understandable and I apologize for saying you sold your soul to them.

If put in the same situation I would probably do the same.

It doesn't change the fact that the system is fatally flawed. And the profits you have made overseas have been a small piece to the puzzle of the destruction of this country.

The empty cities in China are telling. Their economy is more than likely tapped out.

About bread...

A decent loaf of bread on the gulf was running $5 at Publix. Not the kind with high fructose corn syrup and other sh.it that kills you.

So yeah it's possible bread could go to $20 in the next decade. I say it only needs to go up 50% for things to spiral out of control.

Comparisons to pace advantage? Well I think that PA doesn't have a liberal quite on the level of Riot. Sure they had that weird Canadian guy but he's not in her league. If you want to make this sub-forum better then I propose sacrificing second tier party tards like dimmy and bigpun.

And if that doesn't work get rid of Riot and the new Bizarro Riot.