REPORT: Fox News Spends Two-Plus Hours Distorting Obama's Small Business Comments

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

Like you have famously said, "I can't be bothered to go off reading your stuff." If you want to say something, post it here and prove it.

During the first three years of Obama’s term, his economic performance can be summarized as follows: RBNRFI: -6.6%; RGDP: 1.2%; total employment: -1.8%.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

During the first three years of Obama’s term, his economic performance can be summarized as follows: RBNRFI: -6.6%; RGDP: 1.2%; total employment: -1.8%.

Yes. Those are figures. So? What is your point in posting it?

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

Yes. Those are figures. So? What is your point in posting it?

Wow.
You do not understand numbers in anyway huh? Perhaps I could make a graph and then turn it sideways so it looks right, like those monkeys in that TV ad.

[Clip-Clop]

Despite what you want to think, "creating" hundreds of thousands of jobs when more than those being created are required to break even is a net loss. You can understand that right?
Wagering $25 and receiving $20 after the race is not a win, you know that right? You didn't win $20, you lost $5.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Despite what you want to think, "creating" hundreds of thousands of jobs when more than those being created are required to break even is a net loss. You can understand that right?

Yes. But those that say Obama didn't create "any" jobs are factually wrong. He created, in fact, hundreds of thousands of jobs. Obama's policies did, in fact, create jobs, and are still creating jobs.

Considering 800,000 jobs were lost in one month before Obama took office, making most of those up is a start in the right direction. Do we need more? Of course. Bush wrecked our economy. It's not going to go away when the political party that wrecked the economy have fought against everything needed to help it recover.

If you think over a million jobs can be made up in three years, when the recession wasn't even turned around until Obama got a hold of it, you're crazy.

[dellinger63]

The Road Builders and Public School Teachers!

In Obama’s eyes the American heroes. The seeds needed for all success reaped in this country. Got to ask why the two Obama girls go to a private school? Are their teachers heroes or just taking advantage of the system like the rest of the taxpayers especially those making over 250K?

Does the President realize the freeloaders, his aunt and uncle included, also use the roads and schools whether it be in their hoopties or on the bus? Is he aware many children of ‘loaders' waste teachers time attending classes they have no desire or intention to complete the work needed in order to pass?

When Obama’s uncle got his DUI with a fake license and SS# in hand, could the crime have been avoided had there been no road? Would his auntie leave her rocking chair and seek a job if there was no road to look out at all day?

The President would serve us better if he’d go back to contemplating whether the chicken or the egg crossed the street first. Only now maybe he can ask the man who built the street! God Save the USA!

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Despite what you want to think, "creating" hundreds of thousands of jobs when more than those being created are required to break even is a net loss. You can understand that right?
Wagering $25 and receiving $20 after the race is not a win, you know that right? You didn't win $20, you lost $5.

I'd kill to get back 20 from a 25 bet...any time i cash a ticket, that's a winner..

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by bigrun

I'd kill to get back 20 from a 25 bet...any time i cash a ticket, that's a winner..

I have felt that way many days.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

Wow.
You do not understand numbers in anyway huh? Perhaps I could make a graph and then turn it sideways so it looks right, like those monkeys in that TV ad.

I'll try again: You posted numbers. Why did you post the numbers? What was the point you were trying to make, that the numbers are supposed to support?

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

I'll try again: You posted numbers. Why did you post the numbers? What was the point you were trying to make, that the numbers are supposed to support?

They represent the actual view of your very rosey GDP and job creation.

Pointless.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

They represent the actual view of your very rosey GDP and job creation.

Pointless.

Ah. Yes. I see you only think in black and white. I suggest you read your article again.

My statement was that GDP has risen under Obama, and your numbers, again, continue to support that as being true. Thanks

Would we like GDP to be stronger? Yes, of course. Has GDP risen under Obama? Yes.