Wisconsin Recall

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

Yeah. They probably have it wrong in the copy of the actual criminal complaint I gave you the link to.

I said new documents show Walker lied. He didn't aid the criminal complaint, he stalled it. You said you wanted proof. I gave you the link to the actual legal court documents.

Keep denying it exists.



Yes. I do think the 53% of people that voted for the clearly lying, under-investigation Scott Walker are idiots.

Here's one reason why: you might contact the Journal-Sentinel, and tell them that you think their story about Scott Walker lying about asking for the criminal investigation, rather actually blocking the criminal investigation, and the copies of the proof they published with the story (that you have been given the link to, but continue to deny it exists), is wrong.

Fortunately you are in the minority

You specifically stated that there were released published emails from Scott Walker's office yet you can not produce a single one. Please provide just 1 email

[wiphan]

What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by wiphan

What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof.

Are you suggesting it is not in there? I read the entire thing and you sir are correct.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

Fortunately you are in the minority

You specifically stated that there were released published emails from Scott Walker's office yet you can not produce a single one. Please provide just 1 email

They are the attachments to the court documents you are ignoring the existence of.

Let's go back:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.
Wiphan says, "Give me proof" that Scott Walker lied, and did not ask for the criminal investigation, but stonewalled it.
Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining it, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact". No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof is right in front of your eyes.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

They are the attachments to the court documents you are ignoring the existence of.

Let's go back:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.
Wiphan says, "Give me proof" that Scott Walker lied, and did not ask for the criminal investigation, but stonewalled it.
Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining it, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact". No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof is right in front of your eyes.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.

She can't. It doesn't exist.

I asked for 1 single email from Scott Walker's office. She can not produce it. GAME SET MATCH.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...f+&hl=en&gl=us

Copy and paste from this document an email please.

The document isn't in a form that can be copy and pasted. So I assume you didn't even bother to open the link.

Once again, for the slow:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.

Wiphan says, "Give me proof".

Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining Walker's lies, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact".

No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof came out last Friday, and is right in front of your eyes in the link I provided.

Scott Walker lied to the public and the citizens of Wisconsin about asking for the John Doe investigation. He did not. He stonewalled it.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about his criminal defense fund not being for himself. It is.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about himself not being the subject of the investigation. He is. Walker is John Doe.

Document suggests Walker stalled inquiry
By Daniel Bice of the Journal Sentinel
May 31, 2012

Milwaukee County prosecutors opened the secret John Doe criminal investigation more than two years ago after being stonewalled by Gov. Scott Walker's office when he was county executive, according to a newly released record.

Documents attached

GAME. SET. MATCH.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Riot

The document isn't in a form that can be copy and pasted. So I assume you didn't even bother to open the link.

Once again, for the slow:

Riot says that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.

Wiphan says, "Give me proof".

Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining Walker's lies, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

Wiphan and Clip Clop pretend it doesn't exist.

Wiphan says, "Walker called for the John Doe investigation. That is a fact".

No, Wiphan. Scott Walker lied about that, and the proof came out last Friday, and is right in front of your eyes in the link I provided.

Scott Walker lied to the public and the citizens of Wisconsin about asking for the John Doe investigation. He did not. He stonewalled it.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about his criminal defense fund not being for himself. It is.

Scott Walker lied to Wisconsin about himself not being the subject of the investigation. He is. Walker is John Doe.

This is the html version of the file http://wispolitics.com/1006/large/12..._Kavanaugh.pdf.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web

Top line, guess you never opened it, huh?

[Clip-Clop]

THE ABOVE NAMED COMPLAINING WITNESS BEENG DULY SWORN, ON ENFORMATION
AND BELIEF STATES THAT:
COUNT 1: THEFT (EMBEZZLEMENT) (VALUE EXCEEDING $10,000)
The above-named defendant between 2006 and 2009, at 3949 East Mallory Ave., in the City of
Cudahy, and other locations within Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as trustee, having
possession of money of the Military Order of Purple Heart, Inc., Michelle Witmer Chapter 96,
having a value exceeding $10,000, did use such money without the owner's consent, contrary to
the defendant's authority, and with intent to convert said property to his own use or to the use of
any other person except the owner, contrary to sec. 943.20(1)(b) and (3)(c), 971 336(3)

Copied and pasted.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

THE ABOVE NAMED COMPLAINING WITNESS BEENG DULY SWORN, ON ENFORMATION
AND BELIEF STATES THAT:
COUNT 1: THEFT (EMBEZZLEMENT) (VALUE EXCEEDING $10,000)
The above-named defendant between 2006 and 2009, at 3949 East Mallory Ave., in the City of
Cudahy, and other locations within Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as trustee, having
possession of money of the Military Order of Purple Heart, Inc., Michelle Witmer Chapter 96,
having a value exceeding $10,000, did use such money without the owner's consent, contrary to
the defendant's authority, and with intent to convert said property to his own use or to the use of
any other person except the owner, contrary to sec. 943.20(1)(b) and (3)(c), 971 336(3)

Copied and pasted.

Then you are far smarter than me, as I still cannot copy and paste from the document.

Once again:

Riot said that it turns out Scott Walker lied. He did not ask for the criminal investigation, Walker stonewalled it.

Wiphan says, "Give me proof".

Riot provides the proof - in the form of the newspaper article outlining Walker's lies, with the attachment of the original court complaint proving it.

So: now it's up to you and Wiphan: What part of the Journal-Sentinel article saying Scott Walker lied, and the court documents supporting it, do you think are not true? What part is the Journal-Sentinal lying about? And please provide the proof.