![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This isn't a new thing as you know. The purse/claiming price ratio has been a problem for a decade, but it is mostly at places where nobody notices outside of us diehards. It was never going to fly in New York when horses started breaking down. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But hey, they're about to have legal prostitution over by Fort Erie. http://www.goerieblogs.com/news/writ...on-in-ontario/ We already have slots, table games, even Pai-Gow at Presque Isle Downs ... how long until prostitution becomes the new slots? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The jail rule is really not going to do very much in terms of stopping breakdowns and in some cases actually can be a contributing cause. Lets not forget that a guy dumping a horse off the claim is 1st trying to dump the horse and secondly trying to earn some purse money back. Just delaying that 25 or 30 days doesnt really help the horse unless there is a new 30 day cure that has been developed. What some trainers do when they claim a bad one with a jail rule in place is simply walk the horse for 3 weeks, maybe pony without a rider on it for a few days and then drop the horse in. Because they have been given a short break often the horses start to feel better, act a little less sore and are able to pass the vet exam. Then because they are feeling better, may warm up ok and the jock lets them run. However often the underlying issue wasnt actually healed and as the horse puts forth effort the leg comes apart.
This isnt to say that this wont happen if the rule isnt in place either but relying on rules with little regard to the individuals who are calling the shots is misguided. I agree that purses for lower level races can be out of whack but lets not forget for those who dont pay the bills that you have to give owners a reasonable chance of getting some return. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Cannon, I don't disagree with any of that. However, the point would be to stop those with the specific intent of flipping a horse quickly for less money and trying to win a purse. It makes it a bigger gamble, less chance for success with more expenses.
No doubt it won't change anything for those that take a horse for more upstanding reasons that comes back bad. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() it's an upsetting article, but I had to laugh at the angry commenter who said they were "finding out" who the main sponsor of the Kentucky Derby is so they could "boycott their product." Le sigh.
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() my first snort at the article was when they quoted maggi moss. hell, she acted as one of asmussens lawyers, and then wants to sound like it's all about the horses. anyone can talk the talk.
not sure what the answer is, except, once again, to beat the 'run the trainers at fault' out of town on a rail. tarred and feathered if need be. tracks like to offer higher purses to keep big fields. owners like them because maybe they won't lose as much money this year as last.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() They'll find out that the race horses are treated a lot better than the chickens, I'd guess, and then give them another thing to protest.
|
#8
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() Some of the comments so far...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I never heard the story about Star Plus and the lenghts that Earle Mack went through to get him back.
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|