A Case of Why WI Voters Should Show ID

[Riot]

Originally Posted by nebrady

Are you serious the judge was bias and should have excused himself from the case.

Really? The judge has issued a detailed legal preliminary injunction for all to see. What part of that legal detail is so out of expected for a judicial ruling, in keeping with current, detailed Wisconsin Voting Law, that makes one think the judge ruled weirdly?

And further, that the demonstrable non-adherence to Wisconsin Voting Law was based upon bias?

What ridiculous, non-reality based accusations.

This isn't a effing joke. These are serious accusations against a judge, his life, his work.

The laughable thing is that, for people to make those accusations, reveals that that is the way they, themselves, would probably act.

The trial is April 16th. A recusal may be asked for at that time.