Occupy Wall Street live General Assembly meeting

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

You are one of the emptiest people I have ever met.

Coming from you?

BarakAllahu feekum!!!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Coming from you?

BarakAllahu feekum!!!

I'm sorry, I thought you were telling the truth when you said you went to an exchange for affordable premiums because of a pre-existing condition of arthritis or the likelihood of arthritis in the future.

Try to keep up. I'll type slowly for you, Dell:

Insurance companies will often stop insuring you for something you have had in the past. It's called "pre-existing conditions". Although my one joint with arthritis secondary to meniscal injury is literally gone (replaced with titanium), and I have zero other arthritis, and I have resumed 100% complete function as I had prior to injury, the insurance company will no longer insure me for any "osteoarthritis" in the future.

Do you think that's fair? That if, 25 years from now, I develop arthritis in a hip, the insurance company should not have to cover it?

And no. You are not paying for me. I am paying for me. You've never seemed able to understand what health care was actually passed, compared to what Erik Erikson and Andrew Brietbart and Faux News have told you to think, even though it's been explained to you multiple times. Your deliberate and proud ignorance, your deliberate and repetitive misstating of facts that have long been in existence for other people, explains alot of your posts.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Try to keep up. I'll type slowly for you, Dell:

Insurance companies will often stop insuring you for something you have had in the past. It's called "pre-existing conditions". Although my one joint with arthritis secondary to meniscal injury is literally gone (replaced with titanium), and I have zero other arthritis, and I have resumed 100% complete function as I had prior to injury, the insurance company will no longer insure me for any "osteoarthritis" in the future.

Do you think that's fair? That if, 25 years from now, I develop arthritis in a hip, the insurance company should not have to cover it?.

You are more prone to develop arthritis because of titanium in your knee and although you should not be refused coverage for future arthritis treatment you certainly should pay a higher rate than someone without a titanium knee.

Originally Posted by Riot

And no. You are not paying for me. I am paying for me. You've never seemed able to understand what health care was actually passed,.

You seem to think setting up these exchanges was magic, free or that the Department of Health and Human Services is a non-profit charity. True fellow citizens of KY will ultimately be responsible for subsidizing your care directly I will be subsidizing those whom the government deems deserving of such including Kentuckians.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

You are more prone to develop arthritis because of titanium in your knee and although you should not be refused coverage for future arthritis treatment you certainly should pay a higher rate than someone without a titanium knee.

No, Dell. You are not "more prone to develop arthritis" in a titanium knee because there's no bone. Duh. A traumatic injury (meniscal tear) that results in localized arthritis has nothing at all to do with the possible development of "old age" arthritis elsewhere, such as a hip or wrist, a couple decades down the line.

Why should I pay a higher rate for future unassociated illnesses that develop due to different causation because I was once injured, but am now fixed and healthy?

That is exactly the type of consumer fraud the PPACA is intending to prevent.

You seem to think setting up these exchanges was magic, free or that the Department of Health and Human Services is a non-profit charity.

No, I don't. I know exactly how they are set up, and who is paying for them (the people IN them), and who is administering them.

You, on the other hand, are filled with nonsensical imaginary musings over what "Obamacare" is, and your factual knowledge of the PPACA has been repeatedly demonstrated to be non-existent, consisting only of your imaginary musings.

And the worse thing is that you simply, deliberately, frankly, refuse to learn the facts about what is actually in it, preferring to spit out, over and over, your nonsensical imaginary talking points.

Like you just did. Again.

True fellow citizens of KY will ultimately be responsible for subsidizing your care directly I will be subsidizing those whom the government deems deserving of such including Kentuckians.

No. Only in your fevered, anti-Obama imagination.

[dellinger63]

This 'meeting' on Occupy Wall St. speaks volumes!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...rotesters.html

[dellinger63]

The Occupy Wall Street volunteer kitchen staff launched a “counter” revolution yesterday -- because they’re angry about working 18-hour days to provide food for “professional homeless” people and ex-cons masquerading as protesters.

For three days beginning tomorrow, the cooks will serve only brown rice and other spartan grub instead of the usual menu of organic chicken and vegetables, spaghetti bolognese, and roasted beet and sheep’s-milk-cheese salad.

They will also provide directions to local soup kitchens for the vagrants, criminals and other freeloaders who have been descending on Zuccotti Park in increasing numbers every day.

Couple of questions come to mind.

Are the vagrants, criminals and other freeloaders part of the 99% or 1%?

And are the Occupy Wall Streeters against providing food to vagrants, criminals and freeloaders or just THEIR food?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/m...hpa8MSYIL9xSDL

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Couple of questions come to mind.

Are the vagrants, criminals and other freeloaders part of the 99% or 1%?

And are the Occupy Wall Streeters against providing food to vagrants, criminals and freeloaders or just THEIR food?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/m...hpa8MSYIL9xSDL

I think their opposition is toward the fact that they are working extremely hard and feel taken advantage of by some. Sorta like the reason behind the protests in the first place. Whenever you have a protest movement, you are bound to attract a certain amount of folks that are there purely for their own self interest (in this case free food and maybe a chance to steal from other protestors). Unfortunate on two levels, first because these folks take advantage of the situation and second because it give fuel to those looking for reasons to oppose the movement. Sorta like using the fact that a few welfare recipients take advantage of the system to cast anyone on welfare as a degenerate loser (you are familiar with that logic, aren't you?). In the 60's the Civil Rights Movement and later the Peace Movement saw the same thing...were there anarchists and communists who became involved in both movements...sure. But they were used by those in power to degrade entire movements....just ask J. Edgar Hoover.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Couple of questions come to mind.

Are the vagrants, criminals and other freeloaders part of the 99% or 1%?

And are the Occupy Wall Streeters against providing food to vagrants, criminals and freeloaders or just THEIR food?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/m...hpa8MSYIL9xSDL

The article makes it clear, they are becoming the 98% for now. Not liking the bottom 1% either. Soon it will be "we are the 50%" followed shortly by the ever popular, "looking out for number 1". People are people.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Couple of questions come to mind.

Are the vagrants, criminals and other freeloaders part of the 99% or 1%?

And are the Occupy Wall Streeters against providing food to vagrants, criminals and freeloaders or just THEIR food?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/m...hpa8MSYIL9xSDL

Sigh ... the "usual menu of organic chicken and vegetables, spaghetti bolognese, and roasted beet and sheep’s-milk-cheese salad" crap was disproven as a lie. You know, by people who went to the park and saw what is being fed?

Dell, when are you going to open your eyes, and start making up your own mind? Instead of so willingly being told what to think without question?

The "mainstream media" has been overtly lying about OWS, especially what happened in Oakland, and you'd think a willing conspiracy theorist believer like you would pick up on that.

The mainstream corporate-owned media has been successfully circumvented by YouTube, Twitter and Facebook. The police attack against the Oakland protesters was shown live, thus when they lied in the press conferences there was already video out there proving them liars. They don't like being shown up, and shown as incompetent or liars.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

This 'meeting' on Occupy Wall St. speaks volumes!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...rotesters.html

Bump!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

This 'meeting' on Occupy Wall St. speaks volumes!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...rotesters.html

sorry bumped my bump but this is too good

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

sorry bumped my bump but this is too good

Actually, it's easier to go to occupywallstreet.org, and read the "general meeting" minutes, to see what they really decided to do about the homeless and Wall Street types partaking of the free meals.

Geesh, Dell: instead of reading other people's opinions on OWS to tell you what to think, why don't you try to experience them yourself, and make up your own mind? Watch OWS live on the internet, read a blog from someone there, etc. It's a social phenomenon. You can learn about it without catching cooties or having to be definitively "pro" or "con" about it.

Try this: Occupy Wall Street daily roundup, Day 41 http://www.dailykos.com

In a move done to personally infuriate Dell, OccupyOakland dismantled the police barricades to the park, and turned them into art. The mayor has promised to keep the cops away, and she is meeting with the protesters. There is a $1000 reward for anyone who will ID the cop that shot Scott Olsen (who is now in fair condition, and will have surgery on his brain fracture in a few days, still on respirator)

And in a very, "Atlas Shrugged" moment, Occupy Oakland voted overwhelmingly for a general strike next Wednesday in Oakland, in retaliation against police violence.