Quick Poll

[Antitrust32]

baloney that it wont fail at all for 50 years.

paying out 78% is epic failure. 2037 is 26 years away. basically a hop, skip and a jump away.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

baloney that it wont fail at all for 50 years.

paying out 78% is epic failure. 2037 is 26 years away. basically a hop, skip and a jump away.

BTW, they just changed that date to 2038.

I'm tired of the right wing screaming "fake fail" show.

"Epic failure" when the system would still pay out 78% for decades into the future - with us doing nothing at all - is a completely ridiculous hyperbolic characterization, especially compared to the history of the system and how many times it's been adjusted already (from far worse predictions) It literally takes only a small tweek (sorry, 'Zig, but that's the truth of it) to adjust Social Security. As we have already done many, many times before.

Geesh, it's like you guys know absolutely zero about Social Security and it's history.

Try this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_...ited_States%29

The right wing is screaming failure, they have been since the day of inception, it's always been nonsensical baloney, and the system is terrific, has paid out 100% of it's benefits, and always will. As long as we do our due diligence in management.

Of course, the Republicans want Social Security to fail, because they want those trillions given to Wall Street to "invest".

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

baloney that it wont fail at all for 50 years.

paying out 78% is epic failure. 2037 is 26 years away. basically a hop, skip and a jump away.

26 more years!...yippee, i accept!....all you guys 40 and under are on your own...good luck with your investments...

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by bigrun

26 more years!...yippee, i accept!....all you guys 40 and under are on your own...good luck with your investments...

just listen to Riot. she knows everything.

all we have to do is tax people more and we will be fine forever.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

just listen to Riot. she knows everything.

all we have to do is tax people more and we will be fine forever.

Riot has already lived through quite a few GOP, "OMGZ, SS will be GONE in ..... years!" false scares.

[Antitrust32]

^ not worried about the future cause she'll get her money from it.

selfish just like Obama. who cares if he adds trillions upon trillions to the debt as long as he gets re-elected.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

^ not worried about the future cause she'll get her money from it.

Very worried about the future because I have many nieces and nephews.

selfish just like Obama.

At least I'm not stupid and rude like you.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

baloney that it wont fail at all for 50 years.

paying out 78% is epic failure. 2037 is 26 years away. basically a hop, skip and a jump away.

according to the cbo report i read yesterday, entitlements already take 60% of the federal budget... according to the one i linked to the other day from '09, in about 70 years, entitlements and interest payments will absorb 100% of the federal budget.
no money for interior, defense, energy, all that 'discretionary' spending.

yeah, it just needs a little tweak.
ss might need a little tweak, the entire system needs a complete overhaul.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

according to the cbo report i read yesterday, entitlements already take 60% of the federal budget... according to the one i linked to the other day from '09, in about 70 years, entitlements and interest payments will absorb 100% of the federal budget.

Yeah, if we don't do anything about either entitlements OR interest payments. We do have an exploding population compared to 40 years ago. Of course our social programs will increase, we have more people. We also have more paying in.

no money for interior, defense, energy, all that 'discretionary' spending.

How could there be "no money" for those things, when the taxable population is increasing, even if rates stayed the same as now? That would be only relatable to interest compounding (mostly to interest compounding) The budget won't stay at X = value in 2011, when it's 2070. The budget will increase. Percentage of budget devoted to things will change, of course.

yeah, it just needs a little tweak.
ss might need a little tweak, the entire system needs a complete overhaul

I've agreed that SS just needs a little tweek, but Medicare needs attention, and Medicaid is in deep trouble due to the states being broke and unable to contribute their portions.

The answer is not just to get rid of the programs, no matter how much Ron Paul would like to. They are valuable programs that help our citizens, help those in need. We have to ask the question, "Do we want to remain a first world country, or not?" Because remaining first world is an investment in ourselves - and we don't even do as much as other first world countries do for their citizens now. We already are no longer in the Top Ten or even Twenty for health, education, happiness, longevity, innovation, etc.

I'm tired of people calling these programs "entitlements" and speaking as if they are welfare, or something evil, they most certainly are not. We care about our fellow Americans, and that is what these programs are about, and that is why WE, as a country, decided to do them. I'm sick and tired of people demonizing these programs and attempting to characterize them as evil.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Riot

Yeah, if we don't do anything about either entitlements OR interest payments. We do have an exploding population compared to 40 years ago. Of course our social programs will increase, we have more people. We also have more paying in.



How could there be "no money" for those things, when the taxable population is increasing, even if rates stayed the same as now? That would be only relatable to interest compounding (mostly to interest compounding) The budget won't stay at X = value in 2011, when it's 2070. The budget will increase. Percentage of budget devoted to things will change, of course.



I've agreed that SS just needs a little tweek, but Medicare needs attention, and Medicaid is in deep trouble due to the states being broke and unable to contribute their portions.

The answer is not just to get rid of the programs, no matter how much Ron Paul would like to. They are valuable programs that help our citizens, help those in need. We have to ask the question, "Do we want to remain a first world country, or not?" Because remaining first world is an investment in ourselves - and we don't even do as much as other first world countries do for their citizens now. We already are no longer in the Top Ten or even Twenty for health, education, happiness, longevity, innovation, etc.

I'm tired of people calling these programs "entitlements" and speaking as if they are welfare, or something evil, they most certainly are not. We care about our fellow Americans, and that is what these programs are about, and that is why WE, as a country, decided to do them. I'm sick and tired of people demonizing these programs and attempting to characterize them as evil.

ask the cbo, they're the ones who put that in their report. apparently, based on their numbers, the currently 60% of the fed budget would grow to the point that there would only be enough money left after the big three of ss/medicare/aid to pay interest on the debt.

and as i've said elsewhere, the word entitlements is a misnomer. unless of course the people getting it out didn't pay in-which does happen.
the issue isn't that 'we paid in, we should get back'. it's that what we're paying in isn't enough to cover what's going out-not so much the ss portion as the medicare portion.
and as the report said, medical costs have exploded, while we have gotten no healthier. i think one issue is that doctors call for every test under the sun, even when not needed, to cover their ass if something odd was to pop up in future with a patient. or, you have insurance, so they call for stuff that you may not need. for instance, i have a back that'll go on occasion-it's the muscle in my lower back. it happens, been that way for 30 years. but recently the hospital here decided they needed an mri machine-and of course it needed paying for. so, the next time i went in with a back issue, they said maybe you should get an mri.
or not.
we called a friend, an orthopedic surgeon, and told him what the gen'l practitioner had said. he said there was no need for one.
oh, and the dr-on the hospital board. i have no doubt that most people would have had it done because the doc said so, and hey, the ins will pay...so what the heck.

ha, then there are the commercials...does everyone know you can actually get a prescription for thinning eyelashes-so you can have thick lashes again...apparently as some women age, they get thin eyelashes.
this is a problem??

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

and as the report said, medical costs have exploded, while we have gotten no healthier. i think one issue is that doctors call for every test under the sun, even when not needed, to cover their ass if something odd was to pop up in future with a patient.

We do have some of the most expensive healthcare in the world. 1/5 of our economy is healthcare. In other first world countries, it's half that.

That's why things like letting the gov. bargain for drugs would save billions or Medicare. And frankly? Opening up Medicare would be cheaper.

We have to get the exchanges opened up - see what more direct competition between the privates does to the prices.

We have to remember how our healthcare system is set up: insurance companies are only profitable when they are denying you healthcare; and drug companies are most profitable when they have the newest, limited availability drugs on patent.

Neither health insurance companies nor pharmaceutical companies make money by keeping you healthy. The US healthcare system is set up NOT to keep you healthy. It only profits when you are SICK.

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by Riot

Neither health insurance companies nor pharmaceutical companies make money by keeping you healthy. The US healthcare system is set up NOT to keep you healthy. It only profits when you are SICK.

I even heard that all the health insurance and pharmaceutical companies are buying the fast food joints to clog everybody's arteries faster. They also run all those Cheetos commercials so that all the couch potato welfare recipient types can pack on some extra pounds.

Yeah, that's a real conspiracy going on there.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by joeydb

I even heard that all the health insurance and pharmaceutical companies are buying the fast food joints to clog everybody's arteries faster. They also run all those Cheetos commercials so that all the couch potato welfare recipient types can pack on some extra pounds.

Yeah, that's a real conspiracy going on there.

Good grief. There is no "conspiracy". Look at the basic business model of every insurance company. Your contention is that insurance companies make money by paying out claims? You're nuts.

You contend that pharmaceutical companies make money by having their exclusive, most-expensive drugs come off patent and become generally available? You're nuts.

Insurance companies and drug companies control the healthcare in this nation - not patients and their doctors - we have the most expensive healthcare of every first world nation as a percentage of our GDP, and we have the least obtainable healthcare system of any first world nation. Insurance companies dictate doctors treatment plans for most conditions, not the doctors.

Every AAA rated first world country - other than ours - has nationalized healthcare.

That's not "right" or "left", it's simply a fact.

And if you want to remain on your Social Security disability, I strongly suggest you stop self-immolating, by supporting the party that labels you are a freeloader and wants to kick you off SSDI and end the program, and you start supporting the people who think you deserve SSDI and want the program to remain in place for you. I am completely amazed that you have spent two years on this board actively supporting the politicians that want to end your SSDI and leave you to fend for yourself with nothing.