Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2011, 12:52 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid View Post
They have wanted Dutrow for a long time

When you have guys strangling their wives riding for 750k is it fair to take away a guys livelyhood for overages, or positives, that don't warrant the crime? Whether people think he cheats should be inconsequential. Show why, on paper, definitively, why he's being denied a licnese. Even cheaters, liars, thievs, murderers, should be granted a due process.
I disagree with this 10000%. This is for a racing license, not a court case. The committee has the right to deny anyone.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2011, 01:48 PM
The Bid's Avatar
The Bid The Bid is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,745
Default

Why after granting a license to a convicted felon over and over they finally decide.... Ah this year I don't think so. I'm sure he filled out the paperwork the same he always has. What makes his ninety first positive different than the 90th? What makes him breaking into a slot machine relevant when it hasn't been prior?

Anti trust.. Regardless what line of work somebody is in I think it's wrong to deny them a livelyhood w out sufficient reason. There should be very clear rules throughout racing and there aren't.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2011, 02:02 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid View Post

Anti trust.. Regardless what line of work somebody is in I think it's wrong to deny them a livelyhood w out sufficient reason. There should be very clear rules throughout racing and there aren't.
I think that there is certainly sufficient reason. A livelihood isn't being denied, a professional license is. If you own a bar and the state won't renew your liquor license after finding some violations isn't that denying someone a livelihood? Well that happens all the time. If you're a lawyer and you get disbarred (essentially the same thing as losing your license) isn't that taking away a livelihood? If you drive trucks for living and lose you drivers license isn't that denying someone a livelihood?

If he stopped getting positive tests and stopped getting suspended and did simple things like filling out his own application or taking it serious enough to make sure it was correct he would not be in the predicament that he is in. You can blame whoever you want, you can say they have it out for him, etc but the fact is he has no one to blame but himself.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2011, 02:45 PM
The Bid's Avatar
The Bid The Bid is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,745
Default

There may be sufficient reason but what's the difference in this year or last? He broke into a slot machine like a racoon in a trashcan years ago. There is no consistency and I think that's a major issue. Now he's going to
be a scapegoat for many guys who push the envelope and I think that's unfair

Training horses has to be his livelyhood, whatelse could he possibly do? If you're going to take somebodies quality of living and livelyhood away then it shouldn't be a subjective process or because a couple guys dislike his personality.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2011, 02:47 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

maybe he pulls a manny and rides off into the sunset.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2011, 02:55 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid View Post
Training horses has to be his livelyhood, whatelse could he possibly do? If you're going to take somebodies quality of living and livelyhood away then it shouldn't be a subjective process or because a couple guys dislike his personality.
What about the people who have already lost their livelihood and quality of living because of guys like Dutrow?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2011, 02:56 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parsixfarms View Post
What about the people who have already lost their livelihood and quality of living because of guys like Dutrow?
See Wall Street. Same ****. Nobody is in jail who should be.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-13-2011, 03:23 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid View Post
There may be sufficient reason but what's the difference in this year or last? He broke into a slot machine like a racoon in a trashcan years ago. There is no consistency and I think that's a major issue. Now he's going to
be a scapegoat for many guys who push the envelope and I think that's unfair

Training horses has to be his livelyhood, whatelse could he possibly do? If you're going to take somebodies quality of living and livelyhood away then it shouldn't be a subjective process or because a couple guys dislike his personality.
The difference is that perhaps more of his transgressions came to light and if you lie about them you get denied a license? Pretty simple. And there is no excuse for not having an accurate list of violations. If you go into virtually any licensing office or contact the RCI you can get a printout of all your violations to attach to the license application. To not have the application filled out properly especially when he knows the heat is on is indefensible.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-13-2011, 03:59 PM
The Bid's Avatar
The Bid The Bid is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,745
Default

Cannon why can't the commission pull all the violations on all applicants? It's their job to accept, deny, all apps. He had the same violations in years past, why is it so significant now? Why is it okay in years past? Let me ask to this..... Do u think if he had big brown this year his app is denied?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-13-2011, 05:25 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid View Post
Cannon why can't the commission pull all the violations on all applicants? It's their job to accept, deny, all apps. He had the same violations in years past, why is it so significant now? Why is it okay in years past? Let me ask to this..... Do u think if he had big brown this year his app is denied?
Do you know what he has put down in the past or put down this year? Hell he doesn't even know what he put down. It is simple, handle your business. He hasn't in the past and he didn't on this occasion.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-13-2011, 06:03 PM
VOL JACK's Avatar
VOL JACK VOL JACK is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: @VOLJACK79
Posts: 2,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bid View Post
Cannon why can't the commission pull all the violations on all applicants? It's their job to accept, deny, all apps. He had the same violations in years past, why is it so significant now? Why is it okay in years past? Let me ask to this..... Do u think if he had big brown this year his app is denied?
Haha..there isn't a chance in hell they would go through with this if it was 2008...and Big Brown was gonna be the big fav for the Derby.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-14-2011, 02:41 PM
Bigsmc's Avatar
Bigsmc Bigsmc is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
The difference is that perhaps more of his transgressions came to light and if you lie about them you get denied a license? Pretty simple. And there is no excuse for not having an accurate list of violations. If you go into virtually any licensing office or contact the RCI you can get a printout of all your violations to attach to the license application. To not have the application filled out properly especially when he knows the heat is on is indefensible.
George O'Leary laughed.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.