![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Nonsense. That contention is what is being put forth by the current AG. Not too many other lawyers agree with it, including past Wisconsin AG's. They are also begging the argument that the Legislative branch of the government is above the law and cannot have the Judicial branch review it's actions. Right .... Along with the attack on Sumi as a leftist. This will go to the Supreme Court. Let's hope voter turnout April 5th is huge, thus representative of the voter's desires. There are multiple lawsuits against this bill: the one Sumi addressed was only reference to the violation of the open meetings act. She also agreed that the Dem Secretary of State needed his own lawyers independent of the AG and state to protect his interests - because it's clear the state is not. Today in court that tape was played of the Republicans violating it at that very meeting - the GOP wanted the tape played without audio. Seriously, pathetic. And the AG wanted the appeal dropped, saying, "the law is already in effect, thus the appeal is moot" - that was, of course, denied, too (and why Fitzgerald went around the SOS to try and make the publication on the website "legal" - although it is clearly not according to statute requirements) I wonder if the AG guy really has a law degree? It seems he's desperate on defense, and nothing he has said has held up in court so far. The several other lawsuits about the constitutionality of the bill are asking to all be folded into this lawsuit. Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts Last edited by Riot : 03-30-2011 at 04:52 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|