BEYER: Defining Zenyatta's historical role

[letswastemoney]

Originally Posted by nebrady

Ok stupid now your jumping on the zenyatta band wagon! Are you kidding me just a few days ago you said rail trip was better! What happened? Hell i was impressed how fly down did in first attempt against older. As for you people still bashing zenyatta, are you kidding me! Shes won 19 RACES IN A ROW! I don't care who you are that is impressive! She's amazing and it seems like she like to toy with the horses up until the last moment and then kicks in and goodbye! One more race to go! She wins the classic, she is one of the best ever! Go zenyatta!

Are you singling her in the BC?

[johnny pinwheel]

Originally Posted by letswastemoney

Are you singling her in the BC?

i'm not. she will be short. but nebrady is right. only its not a bandwagon when you've won 19 in a row. back to the point of the thread. the article was dumb....what was the purpose? i've been following racing for over 30 years and there have not been many like this horse. that whole rachel vs zenyatta thing was BAD for racing. people are still BITTER. here the game has hardly any big stars and people waste that fighting over who is better. i'm so glad i worry about my bets and put energy into that. they are/were both really, really nice horses(historic). that did things most horses could not even attempt. why trash either one? is it really productive?