9/4 (DMR): Debutante S. (G1); DMR Derby (G2); Palomar (G2)

[knickslions2]

Originally Posted by Kasept

5th (4:00) Del Mar Derby (G2)

1 1/8 Miles (Turf) | Open | 3 Year Olds Stakes | Purse: $300,000

1 Kid Edward (IRE) Flores D R 122 L
2 Jairzihno (GB) Valenzuela P A 122 L
3 Royal F J Bejarano R 122 L
4 Summer Movie Espinoza V 122 L
5 Fantastic Pick (GB) Nakatani C S 122 L
6 Twirling Candy Rosario J 122 L



6th (4:30) Adoration S.

1 Mile (All Weather Track) | Fillies and Mares | 3 Year Olds And Up Stakes | Purse: $75,000

1 Value Stream Flores D R 117 L
2 Briecat Smith M E 117 L
3 Dance to My Tune Valenzuela P A 117 L
4 Burg Berg Rosario J 117 L
5 Silver Swallow Quinonez A 117 L
6 Miss Pleasant Bejarano R 121 L
7 Moon de French Garcia M 117 L



8th (5:30) Torrey Pines S.

1 Mile (All Weather Track) | Fillies | 3 Year Olds Stakes | Purse: $100,000

1 Ellafitz Garcia M 117 L
2 Malibu Pier Bejarano R 119 L
3 Hard Way Ten Quinonez A 117 L
4 La Nez Espinoza V 121 L
5 Fashion Trend Pedroza M A 117 L
6 Switch Rosario J 123 L
7 Fortunia Nakatani C S 117 L
8 Washington Bridge Smith M E 117 L
9 Warren's Got Game Santiago Reyes C 117 L
10 Warren's Jitterbug Valenzuela P A 121 L

Another candy romp

[10 pnt move up]

You have to love those socal stewards..........glad I did not wager on the four horse.

[pba1817]

So for arguments sake... if the 4 was the horse who actually came out into the 9th path and interfered with the 1-5 chalk, would there still have been no change...?

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by pba1817

So for arguments sake... if the 4 was the horse who actually came out into the 9th path and interfered with the 1-5 chalk, would there still have been no change...?

The 1-to-5 chalk would have still finished ahead of the 4 despite such an infraction ... so no, there would have been no change on account of the fact that you can't DQ a horse if the one they foul finishes ahead of them.

[robfla]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

The 1-to-5 chalk would have still finished ahead of the 4 despite such an infraction ... so no, there would have been no change on account of the fact that you can't DQ a horse if the one they foul finishes ahead of them.

of course, but i think he is referring to IF the horse that won was large odds and interfered with a 1:5 shot the same way.

[eajinabi]

If they would have DQ twirling candy and placed him last, just imagine the show payoffs with the 1-5 shot, and the second choice out of the exotics.

[pba1817]

Originally Posted by robfla

of course, but i think he is referring to IF the horse that won was large odds and interfered with a 1:5 shot the same way.

This is what is was implying....