Saratoga 5th - No DQ?

[CSC]

The difference between Leparioux and The Boogyman is infantesimal when you watch Julien's ride in the 7th, he almost never panics, he waited for room on the turn and the horse won. If that was the Boogyman he would have side wiped a few horses just desperate to get out in time.

Originally Posted by CSC

The difference between Leparioux and The Boogyman is infantesimal when you watch Julien's ride in the 7th, he almost never panics, he waited for room on the turn and the horse won. If that was the Boogyman he would have side wiped a few horses desperate to get out.

Nevermind the fact you're comparing a turf route to a dirt sprint but don't let that stop you...nothing ever does so why start now?

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Nevermind the fact you're comparing a turf route to a dirt sprint but don't let that stop you...nothing ever does so why start now?

Have you watched him on turf? I recognize the difference in surfaces but that is minutia in the discussion of a patient ride and a panicked one.

Originally Posted by CSC

Have you watched him on turf? I recognize the difference in surfaces but that is minutia in the discussion of a patient ride and a panicked one.

So Bridgmohan panicked? That's good to know.

The way his horse was moving if he had waited then he more than likely would have to pull the reins and that is almost certain death in a dirt race at that point in the race.

In a turf ROUTE it's a completely different story.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

So Bridgmohan panicked? That's good to know.

The way his horse was moving if he had waited then he more than likely would have to pull the reins and that is almost certain death in a dirt race at that point in the race.

In a turf ROUTE it's a completely different story.

The horse was going to win, I think we all know he was on the best horse this race. It was unnecessary for him to take the chance he took, let me ask you if the stewards sided on a DQ and you had a bet on him, I bet you would not be so complimentary of him then. He got away with one, okay it's a good ride. This time.

[CSC]

Surprised no one has mentioned this yet, but they somehow decided to take down the #4 Laylaben in the 1st race yesterday. Yes, the horse drifted out in the stretch, however with what they have been letting thus far in the meet this DQ was surprising.

[MaTH716]

Originally Posted by CSC

Surprised no one has mentioned this yet, but they somehow decided to take down the #4 Laylaben in the 1st race yesterday. Yes, the horse drifted out in the stretch, however with what they have been letting thus far in the meet this DQ was surprising.

It was actually discussed briefly in the playalong thread from yesterday.

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37932

[CSC]

Originally Posted by MaTH716

It was actually discussed briefly in the playalong thread from yesterday.

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37932

I see there was a brief discussion on it, if you watch the replay of the race in this thread and then watch the replay of the 1st yesterday, I'm sure there would be more than a little head scratching going on with this decision. I didn't have a bet on the race, but considering there was no contact with the 3rd horse and that maybe he was 50/50 to get up anyway, I don't agree with the call. To me the #4 would have won regardless. I'm sure someone will argue that it may have affected the 2nd place finish, yes I may agree there; however from what I have noticed not only in N.Y but in So Cal, they rarely seem to take exacta and tri bettors into account, I can recall a Bejarano horse staying up on an obvious foul because the horse that was interfered with was apparantly falling back even though his horse caused a chain reaction on the 2nd place horse that was gaining, there was no regard for the horse that was fouled when indeed he may have figured into the tri or super.