7/23 (SAR): Schuylerville S. (G3), James Marvin

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Incorrect. The new entry rule has nothing to do with whether or not they both run.

I realize that now, I read your above post. Thank you for taking the time to call me out though, it is truly MUCH APPRECIATED.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I realize that now, I read your above post. Thank you for taking the time to call me out though, it is truly MUCH APPRECIATED.

Call you out? I'm trying to help.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Call you out? I'm trying to help.

I know, and I was Thanking You.

[Indian Charlie]

You two need to get a room for some sweet lovin.

[ateamstupid]

I have dinner plans with Scav's mom unfortunately.

[Linny]

Why run both the James Marvin and the Vanderbilt?

[philcski]

Originally Posted by Linny

Why run both the James Marvin and the Vanderbilt?

It's 16 days apart... in the old (10 years ago) days that would have been perfect for a prep... hopefully some of these come back in the Vandy.

[parsixfarms]

Originally Posted by Linny

Why run both the James Marvin and the Vanderbilt?

The Marvin is a 7F race, with many layoff or turnback horses. Aside from a race-ready Vineyard Haven, I'm hard-pressed to identify a single horse in this race that would be a candidate for the 6F Vanderbilt.

PJ Campo has run some duplicative overnight stakes up here the past few years that make you scratch your head (Curlin/Jim Dandy and a listed stakes for 3YO filly sprinters on the Test undercard, by way of example), but this has a far different feel. Last year, the 1-2 finishers in the race were Pyro and Gold Trippi, hardly Vanderbilt candidates at the time.

[Scav]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I have dinner plans with Scav's mom unfortunately.

Easy.....