The former Gulf of Mexico

[joeydb]

Originally Posted by Riot

No, I do not see it a black or white choice as you say. We need to use our oil for gasoline for cars, and develop other greener sources for the rest of our uses.

It is absolutely that black and white in the near term. A sudden decrease in the supply of oil will cause an equally sudden rise in the price, since the demand is relatively constant. That demand is of course due to the fact that our cars are designed to run on gasoline, and that form of demand will take quite a while to change, even when a viable alternative is available. It is not currently available.

Over the long term, probably decades, yeah, there is likely to be a superior fuel alternative in most regards, and will render oil-based fuels obsolete. But we have a long way to go to get there, and it starts with an invention or discovery that government action cannot accelerate.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by joeydb

It is absolutely that black and white in the near term. A sudden decrease in the supply of oil will cause an equally sudden rise in the price, since the demand is relatively constant. That demand is of course due to the fact that our cars are designed to run on gasoline, and that form of demand will take quite a while to change, even when a viable alternative is available. It is not currently available.

Over the long term, probably decades, yeah, there is likely to be a superior fuel alternative in most regards, and will render oil-based fuels obsolete. But we have a long way to go to get there, and it starts with an invention or discovery that government action cannot accelerate.

In 10 years or so Iranian sponsored nukes will be blowing up all over the world anyway so it really a moot point...

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

In 10 years or so Iranian sponsored nukes will be blowing up all over the world anyway so it really a moot point...

They'll probably blow themselves up first!

[Riot]

It is absolutely that black and white in the near term. A sudden decrease in the supply of oil will cause an equally sudden rise in the price, since the demand is relatively constant.

Did you even read what I wrote before you answered? I said: "We need to use our oil for gasoline for cars, and develop other greener sources for the rest of our uses."

That demand is of course due to the fact that our cars are designed to run on gasoline, and that form of demand will take quite a while to change, even when a viable alternative is available. It is not currently available.

Were you aware there are a good number of mass-produced, affordable, good hybrid cars available right now?

Over the long term, probably decades, yeah, there is likely to be a superior fuel alternative in most regards, and will render oil-based fuels obsolete.

I am not saying to get rid of oil, I am saying to decrease our use of it in non-transportation uses. There are plenty of viable alternatives available right now, and we have to embrace them, make them ever more affordable and available.

But we have a long way to go to get there, and it starts with an invention or discovery that government action cannot accelerate.

Saying government can't accelerate R & D seems to fly in the face of history. It's not that long a way. Tax credits for alternative fuel uses, approval of nuclear power plants, credits for decreasing one's energy useage, tax credits for R & D into new technology, etc. all have worked in the past - and currently work - to encourage research and development in alternative fuel sources.

I think the problem with alternative fuel is that there seems to be both a lack of education about them, and lack of will to consider embracing them.

[Danzig]

lol

oh, geez....this guy just needs to shut up!!


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100616/...p_small_people


NEW ORLEANS – The BP chairman's comment that the oil giant cares about "the small people" received an icy reception on Wednesday from residents along the Gulf Coast.

BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg told reporters in Washington: "I hear comments sometimes that large oil companies are greedy companies or don't care, but that is not the case with BP. We care about the small people."

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

lol

oh, geez....this guy just needs to shut up!!

Good lord! Yes!

Translation problem. Lets blow it out of proportion!!

[Riot]

Here's a video of the entire press brief:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_614705.html

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Translation problem. Lets blow it out of proportion!!

He was talking about midgets and was was trying to be PC. BP loves "small people"

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

He was talking about midgets and was was trying to be PC. BP loves "small people"

i resemble that remark.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Translation problem. Lets blow it out of proportion!!

ok!!!!

he should be guillotined for picking on the fiscally/vertically challenged. let them eat cake!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

approval of nuclear power plants, .

wonder why we're ahead of the world in most everything yet behind in nuclear energy? Behind even the French.

BTW Ever try to get a Hybrid repaired?