Baffert, McAnally & Co. on Zenyatta

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by CSC

To be fair ateamstupid, there is abit of that on both sides of the argument. I understand this since this is mostly a Pro-Rachel board. That's okay I'm a big boy and I've never once complained about the treatment here, however if I am going to be be on receiving end, it is only fair that I give some back. You should keep that in mind since it seems to me the Rachel fanclub gets away with far more liberties than the minority of dissenters namely the 3 or 4 pro-Zenyatta defenders.

Have you or any of the "pro-Zenyatta defenders" been banned?

If the answer is no then your last sentence is a joke. If there are more voices that does not mean that one group gets away "with far more liberties."

NT

[CSC]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

Have you or any of the "pro-Zenyatta defenders" been banned?

If the answer is no then your last sentence is a joke. If there are more voices that does not mean that one group gets away "with far more liberties."

NT

I think I said that, being banned is not the critaria for taking liberties and you know that. Look at Couchpants posts, you don't think they cross the line at times?