|
|
 |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is the Horse of The Year | |||
| Rachel Alexandra |
  
|
114 | 52.78% |
| Zenyatta |
  
|
102 | 47.22% |
| Voters: 216. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-12-2009, 07:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
congrats!
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#2
11-12-2009, 07:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#4
11-12-2009, 07:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
11-12-2009, 08:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
11-12-2009, 08:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
11-12-2009, 08:06 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.
|
|
#9
11-12-2009, 08:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
11-12-2009, 08:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Jay Schrieber in his video describes Rachels work as a whole for the year. The different tracks, different accomplishments for THIS year in making his point for the HOY award. Joe Drape in his agrument I feel makes the same mistake as most Zenyatta backers do. One of the first things he mentions is her 14 for 14 record, irrelevant to the discussion. Then he mentions how she looks, how her ears flop when she runs, irrelevant. Not once did he mention her accomplishments during the year that would warrant HOY, he sites the BCC and thats it. Then he compares her to champions of old, all of which ran before BC times. I think he does her no favors here by attempting to talk her up. Message to Joe Drape, "just the facts man, just the facts" - Joe Friday
|
|
#11
11-12-2009, 08:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Could someone please explain Joe Drape's argument that the BCC field represented the "best in the world"?
Last I checked, Sea the Stars and Rachel weren't at Santa Anita. I credit Zenyatta's connections for taking the chance in the BCC, and she could only run against who showed up. But who showed up wasn't the best the world had to offer.
|
|
#12
11-12-2009, 08:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The best the world has to offer isn't that great these days, apparently.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs."
|
|
#13
11-13-2009, 01:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It WAS the best the world DID offer against Zenyatta. Perhaps everyone else was looking for a more high profile and richer race than the Breeders' Cup Classic?
|
|
#14
11-13-2009, 06:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
so, it's not that it was a particularly tough field, but because it was the bcc... i thought the general consensus was that this wasn't a particularly good thing for racing, having so many treat much of the year as unnecessary, as long as you showed up for some sort of supposed 'championship'. hell, i think i'll name my house buckingham palace and see how many tourists show up.
|
|
#15
11-13-2009, 10:17 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
11-12-2009, 11:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
