Obama's job approval

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Ah, a cousin to the "you're stifling my free speech!!!!!" meme, which naturally, I’ve done none of.

You can talk about people blaming Bush, even call them on it, but you don’t get to say “STOP BLAMING BUSH” when someone is talking about a topic on which they are NOT BLAMING BUSH and expect people to take it seriously and then get all frustrated when people call you on that $hit.

That’s about the 11th time I’ve said that in the last two days. Not. Computing.



LOL. no.

You said I CANT say something. Did you not?

When you refer to debates or lack thereof using the last 8 years as the premise exactly how isnt Bush involved? Without actually saying the words, you are implying that Bush did somethig wrong. If not there would be no need for debate.

Anyway congrats to effectively deflecting the attention off of the Disaster in Chief

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You said I CANT say something. Did you not?

When you refer to debates or lack thereof using the last 8 years as the premise exactly how isnt Bush involved? Without actually saying the words, you are implying that Bush did somethig wrong. If not there would be no need for debate.

Anyway congrats to effectively deflecting the attention off of the Disaster in Chief

Ok Chuck, if you're going to take me that way, then all bets are off.

"You can't tell me Rumor Has It is going to win the Sycamore," obviously means that I disagree with your premise, not that you are NOT ACTUALLY ALLOWED TO SAY IT.

I would say such a reading is, in fact, disingenuous, but then you will say I'm blaming Bush for your overly literal interpretation of what I'm saying.

Useless. I give up. Uncle. You win. Drained me of my energy with disingenuous interpretations and straw man arguments. You would actually make a really good conservative commentator, since you've mastered their tactics.

It's like arguing with a less intellectually honest version of Sean Hannity....if that's even humanly possible.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

You win. Drained me of my energy with disingenuous interpretations and straw man arguments.

It is like arguing with a brick wall....well....a brick wall that knows how to post links to web-sites and articles that don't actually have anything to do with the topic being discussed.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by miraja2

It is like arguing with a brick wall....well....a brick wall that knows how to post links to web-sites and articles that don't actually have anything to do with the topic being discussed.

Give me a break. You just dont bother reading the posts and cant follow along with the topics.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You just dont bother reading the posts and cant follow along with the topics.

Now, you claim to not only know what I read, but also how well I comprehend it.
Your omnipotence truly knows no bounds.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by miraja2

Now, you claim to not only know what I read, but also how well I comprehend it.
Your omnipotence truly knows no bounds.

One only needs to read your posts to know.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

One only needs to read your posts to know.

I know she's not Merasmag from the old espn board but w/some spelling skills learned while in the klink? Maybe?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Ok Chuck, if you're going to take me that way, then all bets are off.

"You can't tell me Rumor Has It is going to win the Sycamore," obviously means that I disagree with your premise, not that you are NOT ACTUALLY ALLOWED TO SAY IT.

I would say such a reading is, in fact, disingenuous, but then you will say I'm blaming Bush for your overly literal interpretation of what I'm saying.

Useless. I give up. Uncle. You win. Drained me of my energy with disingenuous interpretations and straw man arguments. You would actually make a really good conservative commentator, since you've mastered their tactics.

It's like arguing with a less intellectually honest version of Sean Hannity....if that's even humanly possible.

Give me a break with your roundabout bullshi t.

You want to call me intellectually dishonest? Fine.

I will be the bigger man and say that is your view and you are entitled to it however distorted and simpleminded it may be.

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I will be the bigger man and say that is your view and you are entitled to it however distorted and simpleminded it may be.

LOL. How big of you, Chuck.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

LOL. How big of you, Chuck.

I didnt say literally. The way you use twisted logic it could actually be a compliment.

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I didnt say literally. The way you use twisted logic it could actually be a compliment.

Says the man who couldn't post an intellectually honest argument if someone else wrote it for him.

xo
The Bigger Man

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Says the man who couldn't post an intellectually honest argument if someone else wrote it for him.

xo
The Bigger Man

You arent really aware of the meaning of intellectually honest or dishonest are you? In order to be intellectually dishonest I would have to knowingly advance an argument that I knew was based on untrue information. Or I would have to knowingly withhold information that was relevant to my argument.

When exactly have I done this?

Just one example. And me saying that Democrats still "blame bush" is simply an opinion based on valid information. No honesty involved.

Keep up the the fight. Your party will need you the next few elections.