![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I love it! In that case, I fully accept Dell's misreading of the article. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
that would be amazing. But it was equivalent to banning meat = raising takeout.
__________________
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm so confused. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
well its a different situation but your one post to del sounded just like a post by kasept. Well when they actually start trying to ban meat, then let's talk about the meat ban, okay? In the meantime, let's talk about possible taxes, possible deterrents, and the honestly high cost of meat production from an environmental perspective, which are in fact, what this article is ACTUALLY about, Dell, not banning meat. Meat is not something that could, or would, ever be banned barring some catastrophic worldwide disease outbreak in meat products. Seriously. and the other one was basically "no sky is falling.. when they start trying to raise takeout, then lets talk about raising takout" "in the meantime, lets talk about how raising takeout could help California" unfortunately.. takeout will probably be raised, where of course meat will never be banned...
__________________
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Eat more chkin
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() These environmental people are quacks. They eventually will go down as the flat earth society of our times.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|