Thank you God

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

What do you think? So your intelligent conclusion is that Giacomo wasn't impressive. Wow, I hope after my 48th year of observing racing that I'll be able to make such astounding conclusions. I just don't see the point of bashing everything. Read your posts, you bait people into arguements for no reason at all. Then when you get your wish you act like why are you argueing, I was just giving my opinion. Then you twist words, and NEVER let anything die. Is that fun?

All I'm hoping to do is help less experienced members of this forum to understand how to analyze thoroughbred races ... and how to organize their thoughts into cogent and well-written conclusions ... and how to justify those conclusions when they're challenged.

That's not such a bad thing ... is it?