plus one and the bcs

[saucon17]

Originally Posted by Danzig188

well in that case, can the ncaa really argue that length of season would be a detriment to football and the players? after all, bowls are mostly around the holidays-an extended break for college students...so their education wouldn't really be impacted, correct?
and really, how many football players are really at school for their education, and not the game?

It all comes down to the money $$$$ these schools make from
playing in bowl games. Playoff system works in Div IAA, 2, and 3.

Only players maybe their for education or some Pac 10, ACC, Big Ten,
Military Acadamies and I hate to say Notre Dame teams.

[Danzig]

from what i read, the bowls would still be there--whether they would suffer at all i don't know....but yeah, it is a huge money maker. lsu and dame got 17 mill a piece for the sugar bowl. unbelievable the amount of $ being generated.