Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahoss
You don’t think it’s possible either one would have been 4th without the interference?
|
Day 1 of Steward Training 101 they teach you that if you take down the best horse in the race, you do so only because it clearly affected another's opportunity to win, Regardless of who finishes 4th, 5th, or 17th. There is absolutely no way on earth that distinction can be made at the point of call in the race the infraction occurred.
Without interference, would Country House have won, finished 2nd, 3rd, or 4th?
that's a Huge No for me.
But because these Stewards ( who, again, were asleep at the switch) decided to punish the horse, its owners, trainer, etc. rather than the jockey who failed to maintain a hold of his mount, we have an also-ran masquerading as a champion.
How some here can reconcile that, I don't get. It makes a mockery of the sport.
05-05-2019, 07:51 PM
Threaded Mode