![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can you explain what you mean by " the bcbc is 20 percent of the handle". Are you saying the live money bet in the Breeders Cup Betting Challenge is 20 percent of total money wagered on Breeders cup?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I've heard that number bandied about before it was said that the BCBC accounts for 20% of on-track handle, not all-sources handle.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's like paying to get into a contest where you get a $10 bankroll and other players $2500.
Or some players at poker table get to draw twice. If some are allowed special access, why would the average player bother to play anymore? Might as well play the lottery. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
How is this related to arbitrage?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are multiple ways to bet a horse to win in the paramutuals, and they do not yield equivalent win odds. If you have access to last second odds with a computer ready to instantly analyze the data and make bets, you can take advantage of those differences.
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I used to do this for baseball, but I'd have to watch lines at multiple books religiously.
I did figure out a way to bet both sides in baseball games where the gain was much much higher, but there was alot of risk involved. It really wasn't arbitrage. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|