Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2017, 03:58 PM
ScottJ ScottJ is offline
Narragansett Park
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind View Post
Since this does seem to be continuously ignored, despite it having been said over and over and over and over and over and over, ad finitum, again...there are three Stewards, one of whom works for NYRA.

If only life were so easy as to blame NYRA for everything, whatever the nebulous NYRA even encompasses.....and before anyone gripes, I said all this LONG before going to work there.

I think this discussion is great, but blaming NYRA just detracts from the conversation.
Yes, there are three stewards and they are supposed to have independent oversight on these inquiries without interference. Agreed.

Yes, there is one and only one steward appointed through the auspices of NYRA. Agreed.

You have been verbal for players' rights in this herding environment. From that perspective, you are the only one listening.

If someone dies on the track (which is how this debate is going to end unless someone steps in), you can be sure that NYRA will be named as defendant and the whatever-defines-NYRA will be pretty well sorted. Unless NYRA can demonstrate that they specifically intervened with the entire set of stewards, it will be a very difficult position to defend as the racetrack operator. There has just been too much press on the issue to ignore the inherent rough riding risks which, to me, have gone beyond the risks inherent in the game.

Andy, we have written on Twitter many times before and I know you are not supporting the level of rough riding that we now see. You shoulder way too much "flack" for NYRA based on your very visible persona both on TV, the NYRA Network, and on your own time on boards like these. You seem to be the only one listening - or even commenting - on what is happening between the rails.

I am just happy that you are listening even if you are the only one left at NYRA who cares.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2017, 01:36 PM
pointman's Avatar
pointman pointman is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ View Post
Yes, there are three stewards and they are supposed to have independent oversight on these inquiries without interference. Agreed.

Yes, there is one and only one steward appointed through the auspices of NYRA. Agreed.

You have been verbal for players' rights in this herding environment. From that perspective, you are the only one listening.

If someone dies on the track (which is how this debate is going to end unless someone steps in), you can be sure that NYRA will be named as defendant and the whatever-defines-NYRA will be pretty well sorted. Unless NYRA can demonstrate that they specifically intervened with the entire set of stewards, it will be a very difficult position to defend as the racetrack operator. There has just been too much press on the issue to ignore the inherent rough riding risks which, to me, have gone beyond the risks inherent in the game.

Andy, we have written on Twitter many times before and I know you are not supporting the level of rough riding that we now see. You shoulder way too much "flack" for NYRA based on your very visible persona both on TV, the NYRA Network, and on your own time on boards like these. You seem to be the only one listening - or even commenting - on what is happening between the rails.

I am just happy that you are listening even if you are the only one left at NYRA who cares.
NYRA need not worry about being sued for a jockey incident. New York State Law is very clear that a jockey injured while riding a horse, whether in a race or excercising, regardless of just about any circumstance, cannot maintain suit for their injuries as riding horses is covered by the doctrine of assumption of risk which is a complete defense to any suit. It stems from the Ron Turcotte incident in the matter of Turcotte v. Fell and also does not allow suit against a jockey that negligently causes a fall.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2017, 03:40 PM
hoovesupsideyourhead's Avatar
hoovesupsideyourhead hoovesupsideyourhead is offline
"The Kentucky Killing Machine"
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 16,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pointman View Post
NYRA need not worry about being sued for a jockey incident. New York State Law is very clear that a jockey injured while riding a horse, whether in a race or excercising, regardless of just about any circumstance, cannot maintain suit for their injuries as riding horses is covered by the doctrine of assumption of risk which is a complete defense to any suit. It stems from the Ron Turcotte incident in the matter of Turcotte v. Fell and also does not allow suit against a jockey that negligently causes a fall.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2017, 05:36 PM
ScottJ ScottJ is offline
Narragansett Park
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pointman View Post
NYRA need not worry about being sued for a jockey incident. New York State Law is very clear that a jockey injured while riding a horse, whether in a race or excercising, regardless of just about any circumstance, cannot maintain suit for their injuries as riding horses is covered by the doctrine of assumption of risk which is a complete defense to any suit. It stems from the Ron Turcotte incident in the matter of Turcotte v. Fell and also does not allow suit against a jockey that negligently causes a fall.
Fair point although recent findings from a Queens Judge in 2013 questioned NYRA's ability to use the assumption of risk clause, but your point is very well taken.

My point here was not the lawsuit, but rather the injury down the stretch that will undoubtedly happen. How do you think that would play during opening week at Saratoga? Do you think they would clamp down on the herding at that point?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2017, 06:26 PM
pointman's Avatar
pointman pointman is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottJ View Post
Fair point although recent findings from a Queens Judge in 2013 questioned NYRA's ability to use the assumption of risk clause, but your point is very well taken.

My point here was not the lawsuit, but rather the injury down the stretch that will undoubtedly happen. How do you think that would play during opening week at Saratoga? Do you think they would clamp down on the herding at that point?
I understand that your main point is not a lawsuit, but in New York the enforcement is not going to come from the courts. I agree that herding is way too prevalent in New York and the stewards have let riders, particularly Castellano, get away with it for way too long. The enforcement has to come from the stewards or someone is going to get hurt badly.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-23-2017, 09:17 AM
Flatterer's Avatar
Flatterer Flatterer is offline
Delaware Park
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 189
Default

The NYRA stewards remained consistent with a "no call" for Lady Eli in the Diana on Saturday.

I'm surprised the stewards took so long in their review.

I just hope Irad Ortiz doesn't cause an accident during the rest of the meet.

Unfortunately, blood will have to be spilled before the NYRA stewards take a different view of this riding technique.
__________________
33% of the time - favorites win every time
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-23-2017, 01:48 PM
10 pnt move up's Avatar
10 pnt move up 10 pnt move up is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatterer View Post
The NYRA stewards remained consistent with a "no call" for Lady Eli in the Diana on Saturday.

I'm surprised the stewards took so long in their review.

I just hope Irad Ortiz doesn't cause an accident during the rest of the meet.

Unfortunately, blood will have to be spilled before the NYRA stewards take a different view of this riding technique.
The best shot was the back pan view when you could see half the riders body to the left of the horse, a clear move to intimidate and push his horse over. But you are right, the laws are what is enforced, not necessarily what is written.

What he did is perfectly fine by the standards the stewards have set.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-24-2017, 12:48 AM
Kitan Kitan is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Other side of the globe
Posts: 1,208
Default

No mention here of Mike Smith herding Elate into the infield? I get you want to be side by side to keep the horse competitive And I don't think it was a DQ but pretty darn dangerous.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.