![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wouldn't it be more punitive if they were forced to serve this suspension next year at Saratoga instead at the beginning of the Belmont meet where not much is happening big stakes wise
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Is it up to the stewards or the jocks? I would think that the best policy would be having to serve the days within 5 days of the suspension coming down.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I could be wrong and Steve will know, but I believe the game that is played is filing an appeal which stays the suspension until the appeal is heard and then withdrawing the appeal when the rider wants to be suspended before the appeal is heard.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's a suspension right. You get days, you serve them . Usually as soon as you are suspended.....in most walks of life. To wait a year is ridiculous
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
So then it's no holds barred during the end of a big money meet trying to get the big purses. No incentive to bend the rules there
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|