Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny
Thanks for he update.As a former contest,player i found that I preferred the other type of contest using the fictitious money and set number of bets as opposed to live unlimited money contests as I am a smaller player and do not make large bets needed o win this type contest. It gives richer players an advanage of sorts to me,or little guys with bigger cojones.Not for me, thanks. Maybe you can suggest o them that they also offer the other type contest as well once,although he track wouldnot get the cash flow and takeout.
|
To each their own - the other format represents the majority of contests and of course there is nothing wrong with it. I have played both myself.
Just to be clear though - there should not be any advantage for more well off players. Everyone starts with the same $100 bankroll and you cannot add to it any other way than by winning. I think it's the unlimited play that gives the contest its appeal, since, yes, you can amass a greater bankroll and improve your chance of winning a cash prize, but that comes at the expense of increased risk - as it always does with gambling.
Borgata's format is live bankroll and limited bullets. I've never seen the opposite: fictitious bankroll and unlimited play, but I would try it.
10-08-2014, 06:50 AM
Threaded Mode