![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Keeneland synthetic.
Since going Poly, favorites are just 9-for-66 in stakes races and 3-for-38 in stakes routes. You have to be out of your mind to take a short price on something unless it's proven to produce its best form over this track. The record of So. Cal synthetic specialists who ship in and get bet is pretty dreadful. The type of favorite you might not want to try as hard to beat is the debuting favorite in one of those 4.5f baby races. They have won 11 of 19 since 2008 .. for a 58% win rate. Also 38 for 85 (45% wins) in 4.5f races this past decade when it was a dirt track. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It seems like Rusty Arnold is always bringing in shots. I give his horses a second and third look in whatever spot they are in.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
NT |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ward was 3 for 11 in those races last year. He's 7-for-23 in them over the last 3 years.
Those 4.5 furlong races are the only kind of races Asmussen does well at on synthetic. He's 10-for-40 with a $2.52 ROI with 4.5f horses on KEE synthetic. In races further than 4.5f at KEE SYN - he's 8-for-101 with a pathetic $0.82 ROI. At Woodbine poly, Asmussen is 21-for-75 with a profitable ROI in baby sprints of 4.5f and 5f. Beyond 5f at Woodbine Poly he is just 57-for-411 with a $1.16 ROI. Losing close to triple the takeout from a big sample size. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Todd always seems to pop them.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Release the KRAKEN
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I suspect Asmussen is going to have a huge (i.e. 'typical') meet and make your stats irrelevant. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |