OMG

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Sanford taking a huge header into an empty pool. What a train wreck.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Should of stopped talking 5 minutes ago. Dude!!!!!!!! Stop...Enough info...Beg you to stop.

[gales0678]

i told you , forget him , get on jeb for the futures play in '12

it's going to take the other half of the bush entry to clean up o's mess

Originally Posted by gales0678

i told you , forget him , get on jeb for the futures play in '12

it's going to take the other half of the bush entry to clean up o's mess

You might as well say Ann Coulter has a shot if you're putting any Bush in that category.

[Antitrust32]

the hypocrisy of these "sanctity of marriage" jitterbugs is so freakin funny.

I often wander aimlessly in South America
when the urge to mate becomes overwhelming.

Someone needs to invent a big gray ball like
the one in Woody Allen's Sleeper. Just pass it
around, everyone caresses the large orb,
has an orgasm, and no one gets hurt.

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Should of stopped talking 5 minutes ago. Dude!!!!!!!! Stop...Enough info...Beg you to stop.

Now I know what you were typing about.

Painful.
It was like random vomitting.
Spilling one's guts does not do justice
to the rambling confession... or whatever that was.

[Smooth Operator]

Wow, rough couple of weeks for cons



Party of 'family values', eh





What's next ... Romney getting busted with a Thai bargirl? lol

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

Wow, rough couple of weeks for cons



Party of 'family values', eh





What's next ... Romney getting busted with a Thai bargirl? lol

gimme a break, this family values charge is such a disingenuous argument. show me the list of democrats who proclaim that they are against family values. when democrats run for office, do they not project themselves as fine ,upstanding, moral people? or do they proudly go on the record as supporting marital infidelity, or at least being indifferent to it? show me the democrats that say that Sanfords actions are no big deal. if you can't then it means that democrats also view marital fidelity as something important, and therefore both parties are in favor of family values, and let's not forget the many democrats who have failed in this regard as well, some in a spectacular fashion.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

gimme a break, this family values charge is such a disingenuous argument. show me the list of democrats who proclaim that they are against family values. when democrats run for office, do they not project themselves as fine ,upstanding, moral people? or do they proudly go on the record as supporting marital infidelity, or at least being indifferent to it? show me the democrats that say that Sanfords actions are no big deal. if you can't then it means that democrats also view marital fidelity as something important, and therefore both parties are in favor of family values, and let's not forget the many democrats who have failed in this regard as well, some in a spectacular fashion.

When guy's like Sanford n' Ensign are forced to admit to this stuff it's particularly hypocritical stuff, because they've really gone after guy's that have done the same. For instance, Sanford was particularly interested in going after Clinton(for the lies,) and then you hear Sanford admit to the lie he gave his aides(Appalachian Trail etc.) I don't think you're gunna find many on the left that think this guy's sex life is a reason for him to have to resign. I don't think many would say he should resign for a lie about his sex life. This is the difference(many Conservatives wanted to have the President thrown out for a lie about his sex life.) Spending Gov't money to go to Buenos Aires? If that happened, then this is a serious problem. Leaving nobody in charge of the state for 5 days? This is a problem. No matter a person's political persuasion.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

gimme a break, this family values charge is such a disingenuous argument. show me the list of democrats who proclaim that they are against family values. when democrats run for office, do they not project themselves as fine ,upstanding, moral people? or do they proudly go on the record as supporting marital infidelity, or at least being indifferent to it? show me the democrats that say that Sanfords actions are no big deal. if you can't then it means that democrats also view marital fidelity as something important, and therefore both parties are in favor of family values, and let's not forget the many democrats who have failed in this regard as well, some in a spectacular fashion.

i'd agree democrats should be very careful about making too big an issue of human nature (which is all that sex in all it's wonderful and weird forms is).

but it's a patently lame argument that those who have made "thou shalt not" part of their platform don't have further to fall when they're caught doing what comes naturally.

it's not the act. it the hypocrisy.