![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fear The Kitten going to be entered w/ Alan Garcia listed as jockey.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Let's just hope Ramsey has him nominated before he tries to enter him |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
He's not a Ramsey horse.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ya just noticed that got him mixed up with Charming Kitten.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
6 is unimaginable. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the over/under was 29.5 at one casino.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This is why the outcry when the system came out about how "so and so would have been excluded" was ridiculous. There are going to be years where the standings are so top heavy (like 2013). All of the top 6 won 2 Derby preps with the exception of Java's War, who finished 2nd in the TB Derby. If there's more of a spread among the prep winners next year, the bottom for points will be a lot higher. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Orb is obviously going to be the post time favorite in the Kentucky Derby, and he just ran 11 lengths slower than Dreaming of Julia on the same day and same distance.
She's excluded from entering in favor of Fear The Kitten, now that Tiz A Minsiter is out after his 3rd place finish in the Cal Bred stake last weekend. You know, because she didn't "earn" her way in like they did. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The exclusion of races for fillies, the Illinois Derby hilarity, and the BC Juvenile not being an auto entry seem to be the three biggest flaws with the system. The 1st and 3rd have simple fixes. The 2nd depends on if CDI is still in a pissing match with Hawthorne. I think the GP Oaks-FG Oaks-Gazelle-Ashland and Fantasy should be in the 50 pt range, so should the Juvenile. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
why should a top horse be barred from entry?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with you, Doug, that the filly races should have some weight toward the Derby since 3-year-olds are so lightly raced nowadays that, as you said, no one knew Dreaming of Julia was that good until her last race, but the list you offer up of the fillies that ran in the Derby doesn't help the argument. Of the list, the only one who hit the board and would have been excluded under the current system is Eight Belles.
2010 Devil May Care- 10th 2008 Eight Belles- 2nd 1999 Excellent Meeting- 5th 1999 Three Ring- 19th 1995 Serena's Song- 16th (won Jim Beam against males) 1988 Winning Colors- 1st (won Santa Anita Derby) 1984 Life's Magic- 8th (ran 5th in Santa Anita Derby) 1984 Althea- 19th (won Arkansas Derby) 1982 Cupecoy's Joy- 10th 1980 Genuine Risk- 1st (third in Wood) 1959 Silver Spoon- 5th (won Santa Anita Derby) So over half of them raced against the boys prior to the Derby anyway. The Preakness and Belmont aren't relevant as nothing has changed with them. Again, I agree with you that the Oaks prep races should count, because I agree filly owners don't run fillies unless they feel they have a real chance and it's good for the sport's profile when fillies run in the Derby. I just don't think that the fillies' record in the Derby helps the argument as the two winners would have made it in under the current system anyway, and Eight Belles is perhaps not the ideal poster child for good fillies who would have been excluded( RIP).
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Overall point taken, but if they weren't going to run anyway, it's hard to blame the point system. It's like the people complaining about Departing getting "shut out" of the Derby. He could be running in it. The connections are choosing not to. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
they need to include points in some of the bigger filly races-if she got half credit for her wins she'd still be in, as she should be if they wanted to enter her. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|