Time for Goodell to go

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by OldDog

Let's not forget the calls that kept the Seahawks' final drive going, first the bogus roughing the passer that called back a Packer interception, and later the defensive pass interference that should have been ruled offensive pass interference. On the flip side, there were questionable calls favoring the Packers on their TD drive, too. The officiating in this game reached an all-time NFL low.

There were horrible calls throughout that game. Feel free to call the commisioner if you are done with these refs (212) 450-2027 Roger's office number

[GBBob]

I wonder if Tony the Tuna got a hold of one of the refs

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/84...-150-250m-bets

[Calzone Lord]

Fast forward to 25 seconds in...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpX3fJunp1M

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

Fast forward to 25 seconds in...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpX3fJunp1M

That is classic!

[wiphan]

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...le-seahawks-td

[Crown@club]

The NFL released a statement Tuesday confirming that the result of Monday night's controversial Seahawks vs. Packers game will stand.

The statement concedes that Golden Tate should have been called for offensive pass interference, but does not dispute the (erroneous) simultaneous possession ruling. "Under the rule for simultaneous catch, the ball belongs to Tate, the offensive player. ... In the end zone, a ruling of a simultaneous catch is reviewable. ... Referee Wayne Elliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood. The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review. The result of the game is final."

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Crown@club

The NFL released a statement Tuesday confirming that the result of Monday night's controversial Seahawks vs. Packers game will stand.

The statement concedes that Golden Tate should have been called for offensive pass interference, but does not dispute the (erroneous) simultaneous possession ruling. "Under the rule for simultaneous catch, the ball belongs to Tate, the offensive player. ... In the end zone, a ruling of a simultaneous catch is reviewable. ... Referee Wayne Elliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood. The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review. The result of the game is final."

Umm..that makes it even worse!

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by Crown@club

The NFL released a statement Tuesday confirming that the result of Monday night's controversial Seahawks vs. Packers game will stand.

The statement concedes that Golden Tate should have been called for offensive pass interference, but does not dispute the (erroneous) simultaneous possession ruling. "Under the rule for simultaneous catch, the ball belongs to Tate, the offensive player. ... In the end zone, a ruling of a simultaneous catch is reviewable. ... Referee Wayne Elliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood. The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review. The result of the game is final."

This is my favorite thing. There were TWO rulings on the field. One signaled a touchdown and the other signaled an interception.

I've heard that 70%+ was wagered on GB.

Of course this is just a bad call...nothing more.

Don't see how the league will recover from this.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

I've heard that 70%+ was wagered on GB.

Of course this is just a bad call...nothing more.

Don't see how the league will recover from this.

saw that over 300 million was in play.

how much of that was goodells money on seattle??

[Danzig]

why have instant replay at all? wtf kind of ruling is that?! i thought the whole point of being able to review was so we could keep from having things like this occur.

unbelievable. nfl has zero credibility.

[IrishofNDMan]

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord

Fast forward to 25 seconds in...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpX3fJunp1M

First time I've seen that and about **** my pants when I saw it was in Muskegon at the LC walker arena 5 minutes from my house.

[Antitrust32]

karma paying Tate back for getting fined for throwing an awesome, legal, manly, NFL type block??

think i saw something about the refs and officials maybe coming to an agreement today.

I thought the refs were great in the eagles / cards game this weekend... but that may be the only well reffed game all year.

One thing annoys me more than the refs... The amount of whining that occurs during NFL games, usually about pass interference no calls.. done by both the players and fans. shut the f up and play football.

[Danzig]

i cannot stand it when a play ends, the player gestures repeatedly at the ref, and then the flag comes out after several seconds of fit-throwing.
who's in charge?! ridiculous. since when did the players decide there should be a penalty?

[jms62]

REporting agreement met

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/09/2...rn-for-week-4/