This CEO - what a jerk

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

My only point was that if were represented by the UMW there is no way the "CEO" could unilaterally decide not to pay workers and make them go to a rally.

All the rest of this psycho-drivel is nothing but your asinine, bat-sh.it crazy assumptions of me which you know nothing about.

Again, This is the 2nd time I've respectfully asked that you keep your personal attacks out of this forum and to yourself..

LMAO

Hopefully a mod will find these self-righteous personal attacks as tiring as the rest of us, and do the right thing once and for all.

You might be in their sights..

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Fuc.k off. I didn't say sh.it to you - there is no reason for your personal assaults.

Now that's more respectful...

[Crown@club]

Proof of no worker intimidation going on the place thus my interpretation that this article to start the thread was pure BS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzU3o...&feature=share

[Rupert Pupkin]

Here is a real case. In this case, the unions fine anyone who won't support Elizabeth Warren. The workers are forced to show up at the debate. They don't get paid for attending but they get fined $250 if they don't attend.

This isn't the first instance in a Massachusetts Senate race where unions have been accused of generating fake grassroots support for the Democrat.


https://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...en_654203.html

[art vanderlay]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

Here is a real case. In this case, the unions fine anyone who won't support Elizabeth Warren. The workers are forced to show up at the debate. They don't get paid for attending but they get fined $250 if they don't attend.

This isn't the first instance in a Massachusetts Senate race where unions have been accused of generating fake grassroots support for the Democrat.


https://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...en_654203.html

Being a member of the Union you seem to think you know so much about, You are dead wrong.