![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I tried to gamble for a living a few years back. Solely concentrated on the so cal circuit. I clocked in the am, bought the replays on disc and kept up on charts and track bias. Loved the freedom of not working for anyone. I had some winning years. But at the end of the day i realized that it wasnt enough. I was barely making minumum wage. I never fully understood what i was up against with the takeout. Training as you know demands your complete attention. Gone are the days of hours attacking a race card.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've heard more than a few sharp trainers admit that they first tried to make it as a bettor -- a lot of them will say they had no success at all. Scott Lake claimed he failed repeatedly as a bettor and was eating 2 for $1 hot dogs from the gas station before he became a force as a trainer. Bobby Frankel claimed to be a serious horse bettor long before he ever touched a horse. Obviously, you did a lot of work and showed skill to get that slight edge you had. Under a less draconian system -- your edge would have been stronger, and consciously or not, you would have bet A LOT more money overtime. It's always great fun and a great challenge playing the horses. For me, the feeling is unmatched and I would be lost in this world if I didn't have it to consume all of my time. I had another incredible time today at the track. It's a shame -- but 99% of new fans can't possibly be developed because of the climate right now. And worse, a great number more who have no interest in horse racing at all would become hard-core fans and big, constant bettors if a climate existed that wasn't so draconian. I know, with every bone in my body and every fiber of my being, that the biggest problem this sport has right now, and has had for a long time now, by 50 lengths, is the draconian rake. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think this thread has set a record for non politics message boards for the most use of the word 'draconian'.
But, yeah, Sal is right. High taxes never really work well. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
You're spot on, Doug, but I don't know that it'll ever get any better. There's an incredible preference, in business and politics, to favor short-term over long-term planning. Yes, reducing the takeout would attract more betting money over the long term, but how to persuade the powers that be that the long-term growth is worth the short-term loss with a reduction in takeout?
So frustrating.
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|