![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
if there is potential harm if you don't use it, and no harm if you use it, why wait? and 'everybody knows'? makes you wonder why then that some choose not to use it. or maybe that's because everyone doesn't know that. perhaps they paid attention to all the studies linked in the last week or so that said there is no advantage. but then, even tho there is proof there can be permanent lung damage from a severe enough bleeding episode, you're still insisting otherwise.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
cmorioles Churchill Downs Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Moore, OK Posts: 1,959 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote: Originally Posted by Riot Here's your challenge: give any objective evidence at all to prove that lasix is harmful to horses. you, cm replied: Where have I ever said it was harmful? I am quite sure I have never said that. Feel free to keep making things up though. then there's this exchange: 05-10-2012, 09:11 PM cmorioles Churchill Downs Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Moore, OK Posts: 1,959 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote: Originally Posted by Danzig and i will ask for a third time, how can you know if a horse will bleed? or when? and thinking isn't a fact, it's an opinion. this was your reply cm: 'You can't.' but yeah, you're right on....i don't know what you've written. feel free to attack my writing skills rather than stick to the points. i've never claimed to be an english or writing major, so i'm sorry if i don't put things together too well. however, i do remember what i've read, and who wrote it.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|