![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great job Doug. I'd definitely watch and "youtube subscribe" to your channel.
I did have a couple of questions: 1) Do you find the presence of a speed duel to be reliably predictable before the race? 2) When you say efficiency in your analysis, do you mean from a Brohamer percent energy usage point of view, saving ground in the run, both, or neither? I think your analysis has some real value and I'm just trying to see how I would use it in my own approach to the race, before it is run of course. Again, awesome idea and great format. I love how you showed all the data you were referring to and formatted it for easy viewing, along with the run itself since I am not much of a trip handicapper on my own. Joe |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Doug will have a much better answer for you... But do you follow Aqueduct? I have been betting Aqueduct almost daily and its getting really frustrating. On paper you have anywhere from 3-5 speeds, and 1 horse gets a soft lead. Its been going on all winter. So for question #1 I would say its almost impossible to predict it. What looks like a collapse on paper, a lot of times turns into a 1 speed number around the track. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I was wondering if it even possible to have a loose predictor of the speed duel - nothing is perfect of course. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
thread jack..
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Question 1. Look at it, and tell me where I went off topic. I def. would like a response. Thanks.
Last edited by RockHardTen1985 : 02-22-2012 at 08:56 AM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sometimes I want my fries fresh off the grill but then I get them and they're soggy.
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Doug, can you do a video showing us how to make a cake like that? Maybe add some some hawt half-naked chicks and call it "Cake Whores."
__________________
"Let the whiners and lazy cry about how impossible "they've" made it to win at this game." - Steve Byk |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Question #2: Most every horse has a preferred running style. I judge how efficient they just ran in a race by looking at running styles and pace figures. I have read Brohamer's book, but I don't use his style of pace analysis. * For a front-running horse ... the most efficent race they can run comes when they're on an uncontested early lead while running a pace figure that is within their typical range of comfort and they're not being hard-rated by the jockey. A lot of jockeys can screw-up when they get loose early by trying to rate too much. * For a speed horse who doesn't have to be a front-runner ... the most efficent race is either the one described above or a clear stalking trip about 3/4 of a length to a 1 1/2 lengths off of an inferior pace setter. * For a mid-pack type horse ... the most efficent possible race they can run is when speed horses are hooked up in-front of them and setting a strong pace - meanwhile they're gapped back in a clear and isolated position with no one else less than 2 lengths behind them. This trip will ensure a peak result and an absolute max speed figure. * For a deep closing horse ... the most efficent possible race is obviously when a fast and hotly contested early pace is happening up front. That's all a deep closer can ask for. It will even help the deep closers cause a lot more if there is no mid-pack runner gapped in a clear and isolated position. Those are the most efficent trips that lead to peak performances and peak speed figures. An efficent trip is just a clear trip in a race where the pace dynamics didn't work against the runner. If you can identify a legit track bias ... horses who run races with a most efficent trip and are aided by a path or speed bias at the same time ... they make sensational bet againsts. Betfair tip #1. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|