Hope, Change & Tyranny - Buh Bye, Bill of Rights

[Rudeboyelvis]

That's hilarious - you weren't even in the discussion - good going. This is the second thread actually, (check your comprehension) one dealt with the Senate bill 1867, and this now deals with his new law. two different subjects - thus two different threads started by me. So obviously I've not only "noticed" this for quite some time, but choose to see the facts without blinders, like some. But don't let that stop you from lashing out at anyone who would bring the topic to the surface - that's pure comedy.

I don't spend every waking hour responding to you, while you hold your 24 hour - 7 day a week vigil on here to defend every single bowel movement the guy makes - right, wrong, or indifferent. So if that's how you define awareness, your perception is off.

Tell me - How in the world can you possibly defend his actions with regard to this?

The reality is that it is an indefensible position - one that might be expected from a far-right fascist, but nauseatingly hypocritical from a guy who ran as a "champion of the people".


So this is the legislature's fault? The devil made him do it? Wow.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

That's hilarious - good going. How in the world can you possibly defend his actions with regard to this?

My apologies - I don't spend every waking hour responding to you, while you hold your 24 hour - 7 day a week vigil on here to defend every single bowel movement the guy makes, right, wrong, or indifferent.

It's an indefensible position, one that might be expected from a far-right facist, but nauseatingly hypocritical from a guy who ran as a "champion of the people".


So this is the legislature's fault? The devil made him do it? Wow.

Sigh.

If only you "anti-Obama-ites" had a foot grounded in reality, and didn't just make angry crap up whole cloth out of thin air, about what you guess to be the other person's position or thoughts or viewpoint.

I'm really not into debating your guys imaginary boogeymen and leaps of assumption, or defending myself from your vividly false imagination.

[Antitrust32]

Sigh.

Rudeboyelvis... don't you know that Riot knows everything about everything? and that Obama is the greatest president ever? He can do no wrong.

The evil republicans FORCED Obama to sign a law that violates the constitution. Its the SENATE's fault.. lead by those filthy GOP... oh wait, the Senate has a Dem majority. It has to be the House's fault. Obama is perfect just like Riot.

Sigh.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Sigh.

Rudeboyelvis... don't you know that Riot knows everything about everything? and that Obama is the greatest president ever? He can do no wrong.

The evil republicans FORCED Obama to sign a law that violates the constitution. Its the SENATE's fault.. lead by those filthy GOP... oh wait, the Senate has a Dem majority. It has to be the House's fault. Obama is perfect just like Riot.

Sigh.

Too bad that's not my point of view. Either are any of Rude's assumptions. And I'm not referring to the two threads that Rude started.

Geeshus, teh angry, hating stupid, it burns.

[Antitrust32]

where does it burn Riot? when you go #1? You should really see a doctor.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

where does it burn Riot? when you go #1? You should really see a doctor.

We need to fund more public education. Reading. Then maybe the presumptively angry wouldn't sound so obnoxiously stupid screaming at me for positions I don't hold. You guys are entertaining, to a point. Then you're just ... obnoxious.

[Honu]

Originally Posted by Riot

We need to fund more public education. Reading. Then maybe the presumptively angry wouldn't sound so obnoxiously stupid screaming at me for positions I don't hold. You guys are entertaining, to a point. Then you're just ... obnoxious.

Hey Tabby cats are not angry they are the most fun of all. Dont be picking on the Tabby's. They cannot help the country is run by Jackwagons.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Riot

We need to fund more public education. Reading. Then maybe the presumptively angry wouldn't sound so obnoxiously stupid screaming at me for positions I don't hold. You guys are entertaining, to a point. Then you're just ... obnoxious.

Ummmm...Last I checked, you injected yourself into the discussion; I was responding to bigrun - and no one asked you or cares what your position is. I only asked how you can defend your president's decision to sigh this bill into law.

It seems pretty simple - it's either "I like him as a president, but cannot defend this action by him" or "I agree with him, he wanted his spending bill pushed through so badly, that he was willing to fore go all of our civil liberties to do so, and that's cool with me"

You're the one that engaged in this maniacal diatribe about how everyone is somehow attacking you and assuming what your position is.

Trust us - we don't care.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Riot

Sigh.

If only you "anti-Obama-ites" had a foot grounded in reality, and didn't just make angry crap up whole cloth out of thin air, about what you guess to be the other person's position or thoughts or viewpoint.

I'm really not into debating your guys imaginary boogeymen and leaps of assumption, or defending myself from your vividly false imagination.

'Cause we all know the President goes out of his way to signs laws that abolish the Constitution for the sole purpose of riling up the tin foil hat crowd - you know, the ones vividly false imaginations of boogymen.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

'Cause we all know the President goes out of his way to signs laws that abolish the Constitution for the sole purpose of riling up the tin foil hat crowd - you know, the ones vividly false imaginations of boogymen.

Well, you could get rid of the hyperbole.

But I still doubt you'd bother to notice that although I have defended Obama for what he got taken out of this bill by sending it back multiple times (there were 495 elected Congresspeople people that worked on it, and put that crappy stuff in there, before it got to his desk, after all); I've never said I've supported his signing it, or some of the changes he made to it. I've said the opposite. Long before you started this thread.

Don't let reality intrude when you're in the middle of a good, angry, assumptive, anti-Obama supporter rant, though. It might make you look ... thoughtful. That's right! It's all my fault you are angry! Even though I don't hold the views you or Anti assumed I hold and threw my way.

You're the one that engaged in this maniacal diatribe about how everyone is somehow attacking you and assuming what your position is.

Yeah ... I'm not being the maniacal one. Carry on with the Obama Derangement Syndrome.