2.5 million more Americans insured due to Obamacares

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

You might try reading it more objectively. But I don't hold much hope.

Nice opinion column. Lots of assumptions and illogical leaps there, so it's basically nonsense, but thanks for posting it.

1. You are the least objective poster here
2. It is an attempt to in fairly plain terms explaining why what you wrote before is complete bullshit
3. When attempting to forecast something you must make a few assumptions, all of which were clearly explained.
4. When it comes to economics how exactly would you know what is illogical?
5. For a better version of nonsense refer to your typical prattle from mother jones and daily kos

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

1. You are the least objective poster here
2. It is an attempt to in fairly plain terms explaining why what you wrote before is complete bullshit
3. When attempting to forecast something you must make a few assumptions, all of which were clearly explained.
4. When it comes to economics how exactly would you know what is illogical?
5. For a better version of nonsense refer to your typical prattle from mother jones and daily kos

But do you have any opinion on the drivel opinion column you posted? How does what that writer says relate to what I wrote? Are you saying the writer speaks for you? A guy that's wrong about the financial world 60% of the time?

Or can't you do anything more than ad hominem?

Again: nice of you to post an opinion column filled with assumptions and guesses by a self-employed "economist" with a 60% economic prediction error rate. It was interesting.

What do YOU think, for example, about the vote being taken this evening in the House. Do YOU think the vote should be yes or no?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

But do you have any opinion on the drivel opinion column you posted? How does what that writer says relate to what I wrote? Are you saying the writer speaks for you? A guy that's wrong about the financial world 60% of the time?

Or can't you do anything more than ad hominem?

Again: nice of you to post an opinion column filled with assumptions and guesses by a self-employed "economist" with a 60% economic prediction error rate. It was interesting.

I would discuss it with you if you understood what he was talking about which you clearly dont.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I would discuss it with you if you understood what he was talking about which you clearly dont.

Well, that makes it easy. Ad hominem only it is Too bad. In your desperation to use bad logic to prove that the deficit is the biggest problem in this country, I'd like to know what you think about the Fed giving Europe $1 trillion? Because, you know, we are so broke and all.

[Antitrust32]

after post 39 in this thread, you should be forced to retire. Blame it on a bowed brain tendon.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

after post 39 in this thread, you should be forced to retire. Blame it on a bowed brain tendon.

The funny thing is that I used that article because it pretty reasonably explains the issue of national debt in terms most reasonable people can understand. It isnt political in nature, explains its assumptions and why it is making them and more or less shows that the best answer in the long term is to change the system as opposed to what the politicians will do which is try to manage it in short term (for political gain). Naturally Riot (mostly because she doesnt understand economics at all) finds things like Austerity is bs, the writer is an idiot, I'm using "bad logic" whatever that means, etc.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

The funny thing is that I used that article because it pretty reasonably explains the issue of national debt in terms most reasonable people can understand. It isnt political in nature, explains its assumptions and why it is making them and more or less shows that the best answer in the long term is to change the system as opposed to what the politicians will do which is try to manage it in short term (for political gain). Naturally Riot (mostly because she doesnt understand economics at all) finds things like Austerity is bs, the writer is an idiot, I'm using "bad logic" whatever that means, etc.

Well, not exactly, but don't let that stop you from falsely characterizing.

Look: whenever you don't like what someone posts, you pull out some obscure opinion piece and present it as inalienable fact. It's what you do.

As I said: Nice opinion column. Lots of assumptions and illogical leaps there, so it's basically nonsense, but thanks for posting it.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

Well, that makes it easy. Ad hominem only it is Too bad. In your desperation to use bad logic to prove that the deficit is the biggest problem in this country, I'd like to know what you think about the Fed giving Europe $1 trillion? Because, you know, we are so broke and all.

lol keep talking and proving my point...

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

lol keep talking and proving my point...

Be sure to give your Social Security money to that economic guru you quote.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

Be sure to give your Social Security money to that economic guru you quote.

Keep talking...